Manchester City have lodged their appeal against the independent commission’s guilty verdict on the Premier League’s financial breach charges, submitting their case on Thursday evening with barely hours to spare before Friday’s deadline.
The club was found guilty last week on every count relating to the scheme that ran between 2009/10 and 2017/18, in which sponsorship income recorded on paper, just short of £950 million, vastly exceeded what sponsors actually paid, with the shortfall of more than £830 million covered instead by City’s ownership group. The commission also ruled that City had failed to cooperate properly with the Premier League’s investigation. Friday’s filing formally opens the next stage of a case that has hung over the club for the best part of three years.
The club’s position has not shifted
City’s statement left no doubt that the club intends to fight the finding all the way. “The club’s firm position is that, on multiple grounds, the opinion contains clear material errors, of law, principle and fact and is unsafe,” the statement read. City went further, insisting that “a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence exists in support of all of its positions” and describing itself as “innocent of the accusations made by the Premier League.”
That stance rests heavily on the argument the commission has already rejected once: that the disputed sponsorship payments were in substance funded by the Abu Dhabi government rather than by the club’s private owners, a distinction City’s lawyers believe matters legally even if the commission did not accept it first time round. Reopening that argument in front of a fresh panel will be central to the appeal.
What the appeal process actually involves
The case now passes to a new three person independent commission, entirely separate from the panel that delivered last week’s verdict, in line with the Premier League’s Section W rules. That panel has up to twelve weeks from Thursday’s filing to convene a hearing, which can run for a maximum of five consecutive days, with a written decision due within thirty days of the hearing’s conclusion. On the most straightforward reading of the timetable, that points to a resolution somewhere around the third week of January 2027, though City’s representatives are reportedly prepared to argue that the newer, accelerated procedural rules should not apply to a case originally charged back in 2023, a dispute that could push things later still.
Whatever the appeal panel decides, it will not be the end of the road. A separate punishment hearing still has to follow to determine the actual sanction, with options ranging from a fine through to points deductions, which have historically varied enormously depending on severity, right up to the kind of sporting sanctions that would once have seemed unthinkable for a club of City’s stature. The Premier League has deliberately avoided publishing a fixed scale of punishments, precisely so that no club could ever treat a breach as a calculated cost of doing business. City cannot take this particular appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, though a defeat here would not necessarily close off the option of separate legal action through the civil courts.
Guardiola’s message to the supporters
While City’s lawyers prepared their legal arguments, the club’s former manager chose a more personal route to make his feelings known. Pep Guardiola, who left City this year after a decade in charge, posted a message directly to supporters in the aftermath of the verdict. “I want every single Manchester City fan across the world to know I am here, more than ever,” he wrote. “I am, always have been, and always will be, behind my club, my owner, my chairman, Ferran, the players, staff, Enzo and you, our unique supporters.” He finished simply: “Let me be clear: we will get through this together. I love you all.”
It was a notable intervention from a manager who built his entire managerial legacy at the Etihad during the very years the charges relate to, and a reminder of how personally those who worked through that period at City still regard the case. Current head coach Enzo Maresca, mentioned by name in Guardiola’s message, has so far kept his own public comments on the legal case to a minimum, focusing instead on matters out on the pitch.
The wider picture
The Football Association was among those to respond, describing the scale of the original findings as carrying “significant implications for the integrity of the game,” a sign that the case’s consequences are being felt well beyond Manchester. Rival clubs who believe they lost out competitively during the period in question have already made clear they are reserving the right to pursue their own compensation claims regardless of how the appeal concludes, and nothing in Thursday’s filing changes that calculation.
For now, City’s energy is focused squarely on overturning the verdict itself rather than contemplating punishment. But with a fresh panel, a demanding timetable and arguments the club has already lost once in front of the lawyers, this is a case that is going nowhere quickly. The only certainty after Thursday’s deadline is that English football’s most significant off the field saga in a generation still has months, and quite possibly longer, left to run.
If you want the next stage of this story, and the rest of the day’s football news, followed properly, It Was Always… Football is worth having land in your inbox. Subscribe to keep up with it.