Anfield stages one of the more intriguing fixtures of the week’s Carabao Cup fourth round tonight, as Liverpool welcome Chelsea for an 8pm kick off that matters rather more to one dugout than the other. Andoni Iraola’s Liverpool arrive on the back of three straight home wins and a run of good form that has eased some of the pressure that built up earlier in the season. Xabi Alonso’s Chelsea, by contrast, turn up having just been beaten 2-0 at Tottenham, a result Gary Neville described as simply awful, and with their best player suspended for the night.

The two men in the opposing technical areas were born within a short drive of each other in Gipuzkoa, in Spain’s Basque Country. Iraola grew up in Usurbil, a small town on the Atlantic coast, while Alonso is from Tolosa, inland along the same river valley. Both came through as serious footballers before turning into two of the more interesting young coaches in Europe, and this winter finds them on opposite sides of a Premier League club’s dugout for the first time.

Contrasting fortunes going into a cup night

The defeat at Tottenham leaves Chelsea with more to think about than a bruising scoreline. Cole Palmer was sent off during the match and will serve the resulting suspension against Liverpool, robbing Alonso of his most important attacking player for a tie his side badly need to treat seriously if they want to avoid a second damaging defeat inside a week. Paul Merson’s assessment on Sky Sports was blunt: lose to Liverpool and then to Manchester United at the weekend, and Chelsea could find themselves looking anxiously over their shoulder at the top four rather than up at the title picture. Alonso’s start at Chelsea, which began with a derby win over Fulham back in August, has not lacked promise, but a club with Chelsea’s recent history of patience running thin will not wait forever for results to catch up with the performances.

Iraola’s situation could hardly be more different. Since replacing Arne Slot in the summer, he has had to manage expectation at a champion club while also easing a group of players into his own way of working, and a run of home matches without a win earlier in the autumn had started to generate the kind of scrutiny that follows every Liverpool manager sooner or later. Sunday’s 2-0 win over Brighton, in which Alexander Isak scored again despite Liverpool having barely more than a third of the possession, eased that pressure considerably. Three home wins on the spin have Liverpool back in the top four and facing champions Arsenal at Anfield this coming Sunday, a fixture that now looks considerably more significant than it did a fortnight ago.

That weekend schedule is precisely why this one carries an extra layer of intrigue. Both managers have a genuine selection dilemma: how much to risk in a competition that is secondary to the league, with a heavyweight top of the table fixture only four days away for Liverpool and a trip to an out of form Manchester United only three days away for Chelsea. Expect both teams to show changes from their weekend line ups, though neither manager will want to be seen going through the motions in a cup competition both clubs would be glad to win.

A familiar face returning to where it started

One name certain to feature prominently for Liverpool is Rio Ngumoha, who began his career in Chelsea’s academy before leaving for Anfield. The teenager has been one of the stories of Liverpool’s autumn, scoring a crucial goal in the Champions League comeback against Villarreal last week and coming off the bench to make an impact in the win over Brighton at the weekend. Facing the club that let him go, in a game his current manager is likely to use to keep his momentum going while protecting others for the weekend, adds a neat personal subplot to a tie that already has plenty going on.

There is also a second instalment of this week’s Chelsea story to watch for. Alonso’s side also face Liverpool and Manchester United in quick succession. Sunderland and Leeds follow soon after in the league, meaning the next couple of weeks will tell us a great deal about whether this is a blip or the start of something more serious for a club that invested heavily in getting this appointment right.

The other half of the night’s business

Liverpool and Chelsea is not the only meeting of note in tonight’s fourth round. Manchester City travel to face Brighton at the Amex in the earlier kick off, the first of two meetings between the sides this week, with a league fixture also to come. Brighton go into it on the back of a weekend defeat at Liverpool, but they arrive with real credentials against City specifically, unbeaten in their last four meetings with them, a record that includes two wins and two draws, their best run ever against City. Fabian Hurzeler’s side have shown throughout the season that they are capable of troubling the division’s leading clubs, and City will not fancy underestimating them again inside the space of a week.

None of that changes where the real focus of the night lies, though. Two coaches who grew up a short journey apart in the same Basque province, now managing two of English football’s grandest old clubs, meet in a competition neither side will admit matters as much as the league, even though for one of them, right now, it rather feels like it might. Iraola has the freedom to use the night as he sees fit, rotating where needed and building towards Arsenal with confidence restored. Alonso does not have that luxury. Another sluggish Chelsea performance, without his best player on the pitch, against a Liverpool side playing with genuine momentum, would be a difficult thing to shake off before hosting Manchester United at Stamford Bridge on Saturday.

Cup nights have a habit of throwing up evenings that carry more weight than their billing suggests. This one, on paper a competition both clubs would rather win than lose but would not define their season either way, arrives at exactly the moment when one manager needs a lift far more than the other.

If stories like this one are the kind of football writing you enjoy, It Was Always… Football is worth having land in your inbox. Subscribing is free and takes a moment.

Alex Scott has already said no once this year, and Bournemouth do not appear to be taking the hint. The 23 year old midfielder turned down a contract offer that would have made him the highest paid player in the club’s history, and rather than accept that answer and move on, owner Bill Foley has gone public with his determination to try again.

Foley told talkSPORT he wants Scott to sign a new deal and commit to the club for the long term, while also admitting he understood why a player in Scott’s position might have his head turned elsewhere. “We’d love to have Alex stay here and sign a new contract,” he said, before acknowledging the pull of bigger clubs. “Sometimes players get stars in their eyes and they think that Chelsea or Manchester City is the right place to go.” It is an unusually candid admission for an owner to make publicly, and it tells you plenty about how seriously Bournemouth are treating the prospect of losing him.

A second, club record offer is now being prepared, with Foley said to have specifically requested the approach after a recent visit to England. Scott’s current deal runs until 2028, so there is no desperate urgency written into the contract itself, but Bournemouth know a player of his quality rarely stays patient for long once bigger clubs start calling, and right now, several of them are.

A reluctant seller with a price in mind

Despite the public insistence that Scott is not for sale, Bournemouth have quietly set out what it would take to change their minds. Reports suggest the club would need an offer in excess of £100m before they would even consider letting him go, a figure that reflects both his importance to Marco Rose’s side and the market Bournemouth operate in, where developing and selling players well is central to how the club survives and competes in the Premier League.

Chelsea were the first of the bigger clubs to test that resolve, having an opening bid rejected over the summer. According to Fabrizio Romano, the London club have stayed in regular contact with Scott’s representatives since, with their admiration for the player described as genuine rather than opportunistic. Chelsea are understood to be readying another approach before the January window opens, sensing that patience may eventually be rewarded.

Arsenal and Tottenham have also held conversations about Scott, according to reports, circling without yet making their intentions as concrete as Chelsea’s. Both clubs have a recent history of being linked with Bournemouth’s academy graduates and first team regulars, and Scott’s versatility in midfield, combined with his England pedigree, makes him an obvious fit for either side’s long term planning.

Liverpool’s position is harder to pin down. Romano reported in the middle of October that the Merseyside club had made calls over the summer without ever submitting a formal offer, suggesting their focus had shifted towards Monaco’s Lamine Camara instead. Yet within days, separate reporting suggested Andoni Iraola, who managed Scott at Bournemouth before taking the Liverpool job, remains keen for his old club to sell to his new one. Those two positions are not easily reconciled, and until Liverpool show their hand more clearly, it is safest to treat their interest as real but unresolved rather than advanced.

An injury complicating the picture

Scott’s immediate football is currently on hold rather than under discussion. He is sidelined with a thigh injury that is expected to keep him out until after the November international break, a frustrating setback for a player who had made himself one of the first names on Rose’s team sheet and forced his way into Thomas Tuchel’s England squad earlier this year.

It also means the contract conversation is happening away from the pitch, at a time when Scott cannot simply let his performances do the talking. Bournemouth would understandably prefer to resolve his future before he returns, rather than have the speculation follow him back into the side just as their head coach is trying to build on an encouraging start to the season.

Rose himself is understood to have asked the Bournemouth hierarchy not to sell any of his key players in January, a request that will be tested if one of Europe’s bigger clubs decides £100m is a price worth paying midway through the season. Marcus Tavernier, Rayan and Adrien Truffert are among the other Bournemouth players reported to be attracting attention, but none carry quite the same weight of suitors as Scott.

A decision that will not wait forever

None of this means a transfer is close, and nothing reported so far should be read as anything more advanced than contact and interest. Bournemouth’s preference remains to keep him, Foley’s comments make that much obvious, and Scott himself has given no public indication that he is pushing for an exit. But a player who has already turned down a club record contract once is not someone who can be talked round indefinitely, and the longer this goes unresolved, the more it will hang over Bournemouth’s season.

For a club that has built its recent Premier League stability on recruiting shrewdly and selling well when the time is right, this is as much a test of Bournemouth’s own planning as it is of Scott’s ambition. Keep him and build around him, and there is a strong platform for continued progress. Lose him in January for the fee they are holding out for, and there would at least be the consolation of having done the business on their own terms. What they cannot really afford is to drift into the new year with the situation still unresolved and the player still unsettled.

Scott will have the final say, as he always does, and for now that answer remains no. Whether it stays that way once a second record contract lands in front of him, with four Premier League clubs watching from a distance, is the question Bournemouth are trying hard not to have to find out.

If stories like this are your thing, follow It Was Always… Football for more on the deals, decisions and dressing room moments shaping the season.

Michael Carrick woke up on Monday morning as Manchester United’s head coach. By the time he went to bed, remarkably, he still was. Twenty four hours earlier, Old Trafford had watched his side lose 3-0 to Bournemouth, a result that stretched an already alarming run to eight matches without a win in all competitions and left United 16th in the Premier League with seven points from eight games, by several reckonings their worst start to a league season since 1986.

By full time on Sunday, the consensus inside and outside Old Trafford was that Carrick’s position had become untenable. Gary Neville and Jamie Carragher both said as much on Sky Sports, with Carragher going as far as suggesting Carrick should be relieved of his duties that same evening. Carrick himself walked a slow lap of the pitch applauding supporters, a gesture widely read as a farewell. Asked about it afterwards, he pushed back, telling Sky Sports that was not what it had been about, describing his feelings as mixed and saying he simply needed time to take in the reaction from the stands.

What followed was not the swift, decisive sacking many had expected, but something stranger: a club that appeared to have made up its mind, unable to say so out loud.

A hierarchy talking without him

On Monday, Manchester United’s senior leadership gathered at the club’s Carrington training complex for what were widely described as crunch talks on Carrick’s future. Chief executive Omar Berrada, director of football Jason Wilcox and head of recruitment Christopher Vivell were all involved in those discussions. Carrick was not. He arrived separately that afternoon, at around 1.50pm, to watch an under-21 friendly against Hull City, a reason for being at the training ground that nobody seriously believed was his only one.

It capped a miserable few days that had begun the previous Wednesday, when United lost 4-1 at Como in the Champions League. Bruno Fernandes, the club’s captain, used an interview with Sky Italia afterwards to suggest that managers and coaching staff needed to make bolder in-game changes, comments widely interpreted as criticism of Carrick himself. Carrick’s response was blunt: Fernandes was left out of the squad entirely for the Bournemouth game, unused for the full 90 minutes while United collapsed around him. It is not the first sign of discontent from the dressing room either. Earlier this month, after the Como defeat, defender Lisandro Martinez was asked whether Carrick had felt backed by the club’s hierarchy. “I don’t think so,” he said. “He did his best. I expect more from our technical director, I have to be honest,” a remark that, without naming anyone, was read as a pointed message towards Wilcox.

Why the silence has been deafening

The explanation for Monday’s non-announcement turns out to have little to do with football at all. Manchester United is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a foreign private issuer, which means a change at head coach level is treated as potentially material information for investors, the kind of development that has to be disclosed to the market in the correct manner before the club can say anything publicly. With the NYSE closed over the weekend, United were left unable to formalise a decision even if they wanted to announce it the moment Carrick left the pitch on Sunday. It is a near repeat of what happened in January, when Ruben Amorim’s sacking followed the same disclosure process before being confirmed.

That bureaucratic delay has bought Carrick time, whether or not it buys him his job. By Tuesday morning, The Athletic’s Manchester United correspondent Laurie Whitwell reported that Carrick was expected to take first team training as normal, with the club yet to communicate any change in his status. Against the expectations of Monday, he survived the day. Whitwell’s reporting suggests his chances of still being in the dugout for this Saturday’s trip to Chelsea are increasing, even as the hierarchy continues to quietly map out what comes next regardless of how long he stays.

It is worth remembering how recently the mood around Carrick was calmer. As late as the final weekend of September, Fabrizio Romano reported that the club “maintain their confidence in Michael Carrick,” insisting there had been no contact made with other coaches and that United hoped the situation would stay settled “for the next weeks and, they hope, months.” Six weeks on, with United winless in eight and dumped out of the Carabao Cup, that confidence has evaporated almost entirely.

The queue already forming

Whatever the timing of Carrick’s exit, United’s hierarchy are not waiting to start planning for life without him. Eddie Howe, out of work since leaving Newcastle in the summer, is understood to be Wilcox’s preferred option, a reflection partly of his Premier League record and partly of simple economics: as a free agent, he costs nothing to prise away from another club. Howe took Bournemouth into the Premier League and kept them there across five seasons, before leading Newcastle back into the Champions League twice and ending a 70 year wait for a domestic trophy with victory in the 2025 Carabao Cup. Reports suggest he is ready to return to management for the right opportunity, and few jobs come bigger than this one.

He is not the only name under consideration. Unai Emery has admirers inside the club too, though Aston Villa’s reported compensation demands, in the region of £20million, make him a considerably more expensive option than Howe. Antonio Conte has also been linked, though his well known desire for control over transfer recruitment sits awkwardly with a regime built around Wilcox and Vivell’s say on signings. Julian Nagelsmann, the former Bayern Munich and Germany coach, is said to be Vivell’s own preference, which hints at a quiet difference of opinion within the recruitment department itself over who should come next.

For now, none of it is resolved. Carrick remains the man taking training, the man expected to pick the team against Chelsea, and the man whose future is being decided by people who did not invite him into the room where that decision is being made. Few situations in English football right now capture quite how messy a modern managerial sacking can become, caught somewhere between a football decision and a regulatory one.

There is a version of this story that ends with Carrick given the rest of the season to turn things around, just as there is one that ends with Howe or another name unveiled before the weekend is out. Either way, it is a story worth following closely, and this will not be the last word on it.

If you enjoy coverage like this, consider subscribing to It Was Always… Football for more on the stories shaping the game, old and new.

Harry Kane is the Ballon d’Or winner for 2026.

At a ceremony at the London Palladium on Monday evening, the England captain was confirmed as the finest player in the world over the past twelve months, becoming the first Englishman to win the award since Michael Owen in 2001. It closes out 25 years of waiting, and for Kane personally, it finally answers a question that has followed him for the best part of a decade: whether relentless, prolific goalscoring would ever be enough to be recognised as the outstanding footballer on the planet.

He saw off a field that included Lamine Yamal and Kylian Mbappe, the two names mentioned most often alongside his through months of speculation building towards Monday’s ceremony. Kane had gone into the night as the bookmakers’ clear favourite, and that status was confirmed when his name was read out as the overall winner, with the Gerd Muller Trophy, awarded to the competition’s leading scorer, already added to his collection earlier in the same evening.

A career finally rewarded

For most of his career, Kane’s story was told as one of brilliance without a matching return in major trophies. He scored 213 goals in 317 Premier League appearances for Tottenham Hotspur, a tally bettered only by Alan Shearer in the competition’s history, yet left the club without a single winners’ medal. He was on the losing side of a Champions League final with Spurs in 2019, then lost two European Championship finals as England’s captain, in 2021 and again in 2024, heartbreak that became a recurring and painful motif of his career. For a long time, the Ballon d’Or conversation around Kane carried a familiar shrug: brilliant, but unrewarded, and perhaps never quite destined to win the game’s biggest individual prize.

His move to Bayern Munich in the summer of 2023 changed the arithmetic completely. He has scored 156 goals in 158 appearances for the Bavarian club in all competitions since, a return that puts him among the most ruthless finishers to have worn their shirt. He has won the Bundesliga’s golden boot in each of his three seasons in Germany, lifted the league title twice, and added the DFB Pokal in 2025/26 to complete the most decorated campaign of his career so far. The goals that once felt like consolation at Spurs now arrive, season after season, alongside silverware.

A number nine’s season of numbers

This past year gave the voters little room for doubt. Kane’s scoring never let up domestically, continued into the Champions League, and followed him to the World Cup in North America over the summer, where he scored twice in a second half turnaround against DR Congo among a series of important contributions as England reached the semi finals. England’s own tournament ended in heartbreak, a defeat to Argentina followed by a third place finish against France, but Kane’s form across both matches kept him firmly inside the Ballon d’Or conversation even as Yamal helped Spain lift the trophy itself and Mbappe’s France made a deep run of their own. Individual brilliance inside a collective disappointment has been a familiar shape for Kane’s career, but this time it was enough.

The numbers behind the award are striking in their consistency rather than any single dazzling month. There was no viral moment, no single wonder goal that defined the campaign. Instead there was simply a forward who kept scoring in the Bundesliga, kept scoring in Europe, kept scoring for his country, and did it for long enough and often enough that even the sternest sceptics of a goalscorer’s claim to the award ran out of arguments.

Leaving the favourites behind

Both Yamal and Mbappe arrived in London with genuine cases of their own, and neither will have been surprised to finish behind a player enjoying arguably the most complete season of his career. Yamal, still only a teenager, continues to collect individual honours at a rate few in the game’s history can match, and was recognised again on the night with the Kopa Trophy as the outstanding young player in the men’s game. Mbappe’s season carried its own weight of expectation, built on a reputation for delivering on football’s biggest stages, but Kane’s sheer volume of goals across club, continental and international football proved difficult to argue against once the voting closed.

There is a tidy piece of football history in the result too. Kane becomes the first player based in the Bundesliga to win the Ballon d’Or since Matthias Sammer in 1996, and only the second former Tottenham player to do so, following Luka Modric’s win in 2018 after his move to Real Madrid. For Bayern Munich, it is their first winner since Karl-Heinz Rummenigge collected the award in successive years in 1980 and 1981, a gap that stretched across nearly half a century before Kane’s arrival in Bavaria finally closed it.

What the award recognises, more than anything, is persistence. Kane did not reinvent himself to win it. He simply kept doing what he has always done, in a shirt that finally gave those goals a stage worthy of them, surrounded by a Bayern side capable of turning his finishing into trophies rather than mere statistics. The three major final defeats that once threatened to define his career now read as a prelude rather than a conclusion, and English football has its first Ballon d’Or winner in a generation to show for it.

Monday night in London will be remembered as the moment a career built on remarkable consistency finally received the individual recognition that had so narrowly and so repeatedly escaped it. For a player who has spent a decade being admired for his numbers while being quietly written off as a nearly man, there is something fitting about winning football’s greatest individual prize not with one unforgettable night, but with an entire season of them.

If you enjoyed this, consider subscribing to It Was Always… Football for more on the stories shaping the game, old and new.

It had been a strange sort of wait. Not a crisis exactly, and not accompanied by the sort of panic that usually follows a winless run at a club with Liverpool’s history, but a wait all the same. Sunday afternoon ended it, as Andoni Iraola’s side beat Brighton 2-0 to record their first home league victory of the season, a result that mattered rather more than two goals in the opening twenty minutes might suggest.

Pascal Gross put the ball into his own net in the 17th minute, turning Florian Wirtz’s low shot past his own goalkeeper after Ronald Araujo’s cross had been half cleared into his path. Four minutes later, Alexander Isak made it two, finishing from close range after Bradley Barcola had raced onto a loose ball and delivered the sort of cutback that strikers dream about. Brighton huffed and puffed for the rest of the afternoon without ever truly threatening to get back into it, and Liverpool held on for a win that ended a run of five home league matches without three points.

A strange sort of victory

What made it stranger still were the numbers. Liverpool had just 35.6% of the ball, by some distance their lowest share of possession in a home Premier League win in well over two decades. Brighton, by contrast, enjoyed almost two thirds of it and racked up 17 shots to Liverpool’s far fewer. Yet only one of those 17 found the target. Yasin Ayari missed the sort of chance strikers are paid to score early on, then hit the post with a bending effort in the 36th minute, and that was about as close as Fabian Hurzeler’s side came to making the afternoon competitive again.

It summed up a Liverpool performance built on moments rather than sustained control. Iraola made four changes from the side that had come from two goals down to beat Villarreal in midweek, bringing back Isak, Wirtz, Milos Kerkez and Barcola, and while the collective shape was not always convincing, the two players at the sharp end did exactly what was needed. Cody Gakpo also had an early sight of goal, curling an effort straight at Bart Verbruggen, before Liverpool’s breakthrough arrived through that slightly fortunate own goal.

Wirtz limped off with an ankle knock just past the hour mark, replaced by teenager Trey Nyoni, who promptly produced a last ditch challenge to deny Maxim De Cuyper when Brighton threatened a way back in. Brighton’s afternoon had already been complicated by an early blow of their own: Ferdi Kadioglu went off with what looked like a hip problem inside the first ten minutes, forcing an unwanted reshuffle before the game had really settled.

Isak’s quiet habit of finding the net

The more significant story, in the longer run, is what Isak is doing with the chances that come his way. His goal against Brighton was his sixth in the Premier League this season and his third league match in succession with his name on the scoresheet, a run that, according to Opta’s data, is his best since a run of eight consecutive matches back in January 2025. For a player signed from Newcastle for a fee in the region of £125 million, that sort of consistency is precisely what was asked of him, and precisely what Liverpool have not always been able to count on from their forward line in recent months.

It helps, too, that others around him are contributing to the service rather than needing to be served themselves. Barcola’s burst to reach Olivier Boscagli’s blocked clearance, and the composure to find Isak rather than shoot himself, was the sort of selfless, game reading contribution that often gets overlooked next to the finish it created. Wirtz, for all that his own afternoon petered out early through injury, was involved in the move that led to the opening goal even if the own goal column will not record it that way.

Iraola, speaking afterwards, kept his assessment simple. “We needed this win at home and to celebrate with the supporters,” he said, adding that he had liked the collective spirit his side showed even when the ball was not behaving the way they wanted it to. It was the sort of understated reaction that suggested a manager more relieved than triumphant, aware that a run of five winless home league games, whatever the underlying performances, was becoming a theme worth ending rather than explaining away.

What it means from here

The result lifts Liverpool to fourth in the table on 15 points from eight games, a single point behind Brighton and four behind the joint leaders, Arsenal and Manchester City, who sit level on 21 points apiece after their own weekend results. It is Liverpool’s fourth consecutive win in all competitions, a run that began with that dramatic recovery against Villarreal in Europe, and the sort of momentum a side with genuine title ambitions needs to start building regardless of how it is achieved.

For Brighton, it was only their second defeat of the season and their first since the end of August, a reminder that even the division’s form team eventually runs into an afternoon where the final pass or the final touch will not go their way. Hurzeler did not try to dress it up afterwards, calling it “a missed opportunity” and making clear his frustration was with his own side’s mistakes rather than anything Liverpool did particularly well, pointing to two needless errors that handed Liverpool their goals. It was a fair assessment given how little else Liverpool created in open play.

Both sides now turn to the Carabao Cup in midweek, Liverpool at home to Chelsea and Brighton away at Manchester City, before Liverpool host Arsenal next Sunday in a match that already looks like a serious examination of how real their recent momentum is. Brighton, meanwhile, travel to the Etihad in the league three days after that, a stern enough task to find out whether Sunday’s wobble was a one off or the first sign that the pace they have set all season was always going to be hard to sustain.

None of it changes what mattered most on Sunday. A difficult run at home is over, a big money forward is finding exactly the sort of form his price tag demanded, and a manager still finding his feet in a new job got the afternoon, and the reaction from his own supporters, that he had been waiting for.

If you enjoyed this, consider subscribing to It Was Always… Football for more on the stories shaping the Premier League and beyond.

Michael Carrick left Bruno Fernandes out of his starting eleven entirely for Sunday’s Premier League visit of Bournemouth to Old Trafford, and United lost 3-0. It was not a close call that went against them. Bournemouth were the better side from the first whistle, and United never looked like a team capable of clawing the game back, even with their captain sitting unused on the bench throughout.

The decision had been coming. Fernandes had used a television interview with Sky Italia in midweek, after United’s 4-1 Champions League defeat at Como, to suggest that managers and coaching staff should be identifying problems and making changes during matches rather than waiting for them to be aired afterwards. It read as a pointed remark about Carrick’s own approach, and on Friday, Carrick had refused to guarantee that Fernandes would keep the captaincy for the Bournemouth game. By Sunday afternoon, the answer was in: no armband, no place in the side, no introduction even when United trailed by two goals at half time.

A one sided afternoon at Old Trafford

Bournemouth’s victory was built in a devastating five minute spell either side of the 40th minute. Rayan opened the scoring in the 38th minute, finishing confidently after a foul by Ayden Heaven gave Justin Kluivert the chance to deliver a dangerous free kick into the box. United barely had time to regroup before Marcus Tavernier doubled the lead soon after, tapping in from close range after Leny Yoro lost his footing in the rain and allowed Adrien Truffert to find space to cross.

Carrick made changes at the interval, sending on Matheus Cunha and Lisandro Martinez in search of a way back into the match, but the introductions did little to change the pattern of the game. Francisco Evanilson settled any remaining doubt in the second half, rounding goalkeeper Senne Lammens after the United keeper mistimed a challenge outside his own area and finishing calmly into an empty net. There was no response of note from the home side, and by full time the Old Trafford crowd had turned audibly on their own manager, with chants aimed squarely at Carrick ringing out as United slumped to another damaging result.

Asked afterwards about leaving out his captain for the full ninety minutes, Carrick was reported to have described the call as a straightforward football decision rather than anything personal or disciplinary. Whatever the explanation, the outcome did nothing to support the reasoning behind it. United produced plenty of possession and a decent share of the shots, but precious little that troubled Bournemouth’s goal, and a midfield packed with three of the club’s summer signings never found the control Carrick had presumably been hoping it would provide.

Eight games and counting without a win

The defeat stretched United’s run without a win in all competitions to eight matches, a sequence that now spans multiple competitions and increasingly difficult circumstances. It follows directly on from the 4-1 collapse at Como that prompted Fernandes’s comments in the first place, and comes only days after Carrick’s lengthy, unprompted defence of his own methods in Friday’s press conference, when he invoked the names of Ryan Giggs, Wayne Rooney, Sir Alex Ferguson and the club’s post Munich rebuild under Sir Matt Busby and Sir Bobby Charlton while insisting there was no divide in his dressing room.

Those comparisons will look increasingly uncomfortable if results like Sunday’s continue. United remain in the lower half of the Premier League table, with seven points from their first eight league games and only a single win to show for the campaign so far, a return that leaves them closer to the relegation zone than to anywhere resembling their traditional league position. Bournemouth, by contrast, moved up to nine points with their second consecutive league victory, a timely reminder of how competitive the middle and lower reaches of the division have become. Eddie Howe’s old club, finding back to back league wins at exactly the right moment under Marco Rose, have developed an uncomfortable habit of making life difficult for Carrick’s side in particular.

A decision that raises as many questions as it answers

The wider question is not really whether Carrick was entitled to leave out his captain. Managers make selection calls of this kind all the time, and a head coach who never dared ruffle a senior player’s feathers would have a different problem altogether. The question is what the decision tells us about the relationship between Carrick and his dressing room at a moment when results have already put him under serious pressure, and whether Sunday’s performance suggests his players are still fully invested in what he is asking of them.

There was little evidence of an angry, wounded response from a team desperate to prove a point. Instead, United looked laboured and short of ideas against a side setting up specifically to catch them out, and the sense that grew across the afternoon was of a group playing for a manager many increasingly expect not to be in charge much longer. Reports in recent days have suggested the trust of the club’s ownership in Carrick is not what it was even a few weeks ago, and Sunday’s performance, allied to the manner of the defeat, will not have done anything to arrest that drift.

Carrick now faces a genuinely demanding run of fixtures, with Chelsea, Aston Villa and Liverpool all to come before the international break offers any kind of pause. Whether Fernandes returns to the side, and in what role, will be one of the first things watched closely when United’s next team news is confirmed. For now, a manager who stood his ground on a big call has watched it fail to pay off in the most visible way possible, in front of his own supporters, at the stadium where patience with him was already wearing thin.

If stories like this one keep you coming back, It Was Always… Football would love to have you as a subscriber. Hit follow or subscribe to make sure you don’t miss what comes next.

Manchester City’s long unbeaten start to the season finally came to an end on Saturday, beaten at Aston Villa for the first time this term. Arsenal had the chance to make that defeat count, and they did not waste it. A 2-0 win over Everton at the Emirates lifted Mikel Arteta’s side level with City on points at the summit, separated only by goal difference. For a club that has spent much of the autumn being asked whether they could really go the distance again after last season’s agonising near miss, it was exactly the response the moment demanded.

It came at a cost, though, and not a small one. Bukayo Saka was forced off after barely ten min

utes of Wednesday’s Champions League draw with Bayern Munich, clutching the top of his leg, and the news that followed was grim. Arteta confirmed it as a quad injury, with another scan needed because there was too much fluid around the area to judge its severity straight away. The early word is that Saka could be out for as long as eight weeks, which would mean missing roughly a dozen matches before he is back in contention, right through to Christmas.

A response worthy of a title challenge

Arteta made five changes from the draw in Munich, handing first league starts of the season to Viktor Gyokeres and Mikel Merino, and Arsenal needed only seven minutes to make the selection pay off. Martin Odegaard’s corner was flicked on, and Ezri Konsa reacted quickest at the back post to turn it in for his first goal since arriving at the club. It was a timely intervention from a defender who has had to wait patiently for his chance.

Everton gave as good as they got for long spells in heavy rain at the Emirates, and Thierno Barry should have levelled before half time when a weak headed pass back from Ben White fell invitingly into his path, only for the chance to go begging. David Moyes’s side continued to press for an equaliser after the break, with Tyrique George, James Garner and Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall all threatening, and Dewsbury-Hall in particular will wonder how his header late on drifted narrowly wide.

Arsenal made the game safe just after the hour. White’s overlapping run down the right created the space for a cross to the back post, and although Kai Havertz failed to get a touch, Gabriel arrived to power the ball home for his side’s second. It was the centre back’s goal in his 200th Premier League appearance, a tidy piece of symmetry on an afternoon when Arsenal’s back line did most of the damage at the other end of the pitch.

The cost of victory

Arteta was booked during the match for leaving his technical area, his second caution of the season in the dugout, leaving him one yellow card away from a touchline ban. He was in no mood to apologise for it afterwards, insisting other managers are regularly guilty of the same thing without being punished. It was a minor flashpoint compared with the news dominating his post match remarks.

Saka’s absence leaves Arteta with a genuine problem on the right side of his attack. Christos Tzolis is already out with a hamstring injury, and Riccardo Calafiori was carrying a knock that puts his involvement in the midweek Carabao Cup tie with Fleetwood Town in doubt. William Saliba remains on the way back from a back problem of his own, though Piero Hincapie’s return to the matchday squad against Everton was at least one piece of good news on an otherwise worrying injury front.

Arteta did not hide his frustration with the volume of fixtures his squad has been asked to absorb. He pointed to a punishing sequence: an away trip to Nottingham Forest on a Sunday, a midweek flight to Munich for the visit to Bayern, and then turning around for a Saturday afternoon kick off against Everton, all inside the space of little more than a week. Whatever sympathy that schedule earns him, it will not bring Saka back any sooner, and Arteta’s own assessment of his forward’s condition on Friday was not encouraging. He said Saka was struggling to walk without pain and had been visibly restricted in his movement, and warned that the club needed further scans and specialist opinions before committing to a firm return date.

What it means for the title race

The timing could hardly be sharper. Arsenal’s fixture list between now and the end of November includes a trip to Liverpool, a Champions League visit to Slavia Prague, and, most pointedly of all, a home meeting with Manchester City on 29 November, the kind of match that could end up deciding where the title goes. If the gloomier end of the recovery estimates proves accurate, Saka would still be absent for that one.

What Arsenal have shown this season, and showed again against Everton, is that they are no longer a side who collapse the moment one key player is missing. Two centre backs did the scoring, Gyokeres and Merino were recalled to the starting eleven and did their job, and Arteta still had options to bring on when the game needed closing out. That kind of squad depth said plenty about where this Arsenal side is compared with previous seasons. Being level with Manchester City at the top after City’s first league defeat of the season is a significant marker in itself, regardless of who is or is not available.

Whether that depth is enough to carry Arsenal through two months without one of their most important attacking players is the question the next stretch of fixtures will answer. City will have taken note of Saturday’s injury news as closely as anyone. A title race that already looked set to run deep into spring has just acquired another storyline worth following, and it is one that will not resolve itself quickly.

If you enjoy following stories like this one as they develop, It Was Always… Football is building a home for exactly that kind of coverage. Subscribing costs nothing and means every new piece lands straight in your inbox.

Tottenham ended an agonising away day record at Chelsea’s expense, scoring twice in the space of ten minutes as the hosts’ afternoon fell apart in the rain at Stamford Bridge.

For long spells of a scrappy, rain soaked London derby, it looked as though Chelsea and Tottenham were heading for the sort of goalless draw nobody would remember by Monday. Then, in the space of ten chaotic minutes, the whole afternoon turned on its head. Chelsea’s stand in goalkeeper, Mike Penders, making just his second Premier League appearance, punched a corner into his own net. Cole Palmer picked up a second yellow card and an early bath. And Mathys Tel ran half the length of the pitch to settle it, sending Tottenham home with a 2-0 win and, more significantly for Roberto De Zerbi’s side, their first win at Stamford Bridge since 2018.

It was a result few would have predicted at half time, when Chelsea had looked the more composed side without ever threatening to break the deadlock, and Tottenham had managed only one real sight of goal through Omar Marmoush, straight at the goalkeeper. But Premier League football has a habit of being decided in moments rather than patterns, and this game found all of its drama crammed into the final quarter of an hour.

A nightmare ten minutes for the hosts

The breakthrough, when it came in the 77th minute, was about as unwelcome as it gets for a home crowd. Penders, deputising for the injured Emiliano Martinez, was put under pressure by Jan Paul van Hecke as he rose to claim a corner from Mateus Fernandes, and succeeded only in punching the ball into his own net. It was a cruel moment for a young goalkeeper thrown into a tricky derby through circumstance rather than choice.

Worse followed for Chelsea three minutes later. Cole Palmer, already booked in the first half for a foul on Fernandes, caught former teammate Conor Gallagher late and high, and referee Chris Kavanagh had little hesitation in showing a second yellow card. Chelsea, already behind, were suddenly down to ten men with a quarter of an hour still to play.

Tottenham made sure there was no way back. In the 87th minute, Mathys Tel picked the ball up inside his own half, drove past a tiring Chelsea defence and buried a low finish into the bottom corner to make it 2-0. It capped a man of the match display from the young forward, who finished the afternoon with the most touches in the opposition box of any player on the pitch and two created chances to go with his goal.

Tottenham’s revival keeps gathering pace

For a club that went into the international break with just a single point from their opening six league games, this is becoming a genuinely interesting turnaround. Monday’s 3-1 win over Coventry City, built around James Maddison’s first Premier League start in 536 days and Dejan Kulusevski’s long awaited return from injury, had already given De Zerbi his first league win since taking charge. Four days later, and without the benefit of the short preparation time that usually follows a midweek fixture, his side went to Stamford Bridge and beat a Chelsea team that had won four of their previous six league games and arrived fourth in the table.

Back to back wins have lifted Tottenham up to 12th, still some distance from where a reported £237 million summer outlay on the likes of Sandro Tonali, Savio and Marmoush was supposed to have them by late October, but a world away from the side that looked destined for a relegation battle a fortnight ago. There is still a long way to go before anyone talks seriously about European qualification, but the pieces that were meant to make this Tottenham side competitive, Maddison’s creativity chief among them, are finally starting to appear on the pitch together.

Chelsea’s afternoon unravels

Chelsea will look back on this as a missed opportunity rather than a true crisis. They arrived at Stamford Bridge on the back of a 2-0 win at Everton and a thumping 5-1 victory over Bournemouth, and a win here would have sent them above Brighton into the top three. Instead, already without Joao Pedro and relying on Penders in goal while Emiliano Martinez recovers from jaw surgery following a collision at Everton earlier this month, they found themselves undone by a mistake from the one position supposed to offer certainty.

Palmer’s dismissal will draw most of the attention. Two needless fouls on opponents he knows well, Fernandes in the first half and Gallagher in the second, turned a tight contest into an uphill one, and Chelsea’s response once reduced to ten men amounted to very little. Morgan Rogers, the club’s record summer signing from Aston Villa, was introduced in search of an equaliser but picked up a late booking of his own rather than a breakthrough. Xabi Alonso’s side remain fourth on 13 points, but a weekend that began with the chance to close on the top two instead ends with questions about squad depth in Joao Pedro’s absence and discipline in the final third of games.

What it means from here

Both clubs now turn to midweek Carabao Cup football, with Chelsea making the trip to Anfield to face Liverpool and Tottenham, already out of that competition, left to focus on bedding in their recent momentum before a home game against Crystal Palace. For Tottenham, the challenge now is proving that beating a wounded Chelsea was the start of something rather than a one off. For Chelsea, it is about showing that one chaotic ten minute spell in the rain does not undo the form they had built over the previous month.

It was the kind of afternoon that reminds you why nobody in London ever takes a Chelsea versus Tottenham fixture for granted, whatever the respective league positions suggest beforehand. For more results like this one, and the stories behind them all season long, It Was Always… Football is well worth subscribing to.

Nicolas Jackson scored twice in the space of an hour to give Aston Villa a 2-1 win over Manchester City at Villa Park on Saturday, ending the perfect start Enzo Maresca had made to his time as City manager and producing the most eye catching result anywhere in the Premier League this weekend.

City had arrived in the West Midlands unbeaten in the league this season, sitting top of the table on 21 points from seven games and growing into genuine title favourites under their new head coach. They left with that record gone, beaten by a forward who cost Villa a club record £65 million fee in the summer and who is now repaying it in the most direct way possible.

Villa’s win moves them up to sixth in the table and gives Unai Emery his first home league victory of the season, a timely response after his side lost three of their opening five Premier League matches. For City, it is simply the first defeat of Maresca’s reign, and the first time this season they have left a ground without at least a point.

Jackson strikes twice to settle it

The afternoon turned early. In the seventh minute, John McGinn found space down the left and played the ball into the area, where Marc Guehi failed to deal with it cleanly. Jackson read the mistake quickest, nipped in ahead of the City defence and finished low past Gianluigi Donnarumma to put Villa ahead inside ten minutes.

City responded the way a side that had not lost all season tends to: patiently, and with increasing control of the ball. Zion Suzuki had to be alert to deny Rayan Cherki just after the quarter hour, and Iliman Ndiaye struck a post shortly afterwards as City searched for an equaliser that eventually arrived just after half time. Ndiaye turned provider in the 52nd minute, whipping in a cross that Erling Haaland met with a firm header to level the scores.

The lead did not last. Within a few minutes of Haaland’s goal, Ibrahim Mbaye drove at the Villa Park crowd’s end of the pitch and cut the ball back for Jackson, who took it first time and sent it under Donnarumma to restore Villa’s advantage just past the hour mark. It was Jackson’s sixth goal in his last six appearances in all competitions, a run that has turned him from a club record outlay into Villa’s most reliable source of goals.

Villa’s need for goals this season has been obvious, and it came alongside one of the biggest squad overhauls in the club’s recent history. Ollie Watkins, their all time leading Premier League scorer, left for Al Hilal in Saudi Arabia for a reported £51 million at the end of the summer window, one of several long serving names to depart alongside him. Jackson arrived as his replacement that same week, and after a quiet first few weeks finding his feet in a struggling side, he now looks like exactly the kind of goalscorer Villa paid a club record fee to secure.

City dominated the ball but not the moments that mattered

The numbers told their own story. City finished with 63% of the possession and 1.79 expected goals to Villa’s 0.61, the kind of territorial and chance creating dominance that would usually be enough to win most Premier League matches comfortably. Suzuki kept them at arm’s length when it mattered: he pushed a Josko Gvardiol strike onto the bar shortly after Jackson’s second, and Ian Maatsen was on hand to clear a late Haaland effort off the line in the 89th minute as City searched desperately for a way back in.

Guehi, whose error had led to Villa’s opener, was withdrawn at half time, with Maresca explaining afterwards that it was a precaution with his defender already on a yellow card rather than anything more serious. The City manager was blunt about where the game had been lost. “We lost the game because we were not being clinical enough in their box,” he said, pointing to the gulf between the chances his side created and what they actually managed to put away.

That is not a complaint many could make about Jackson, who took both of the chances that mattered and was named player of the match with barely a dissenting voice.

A different kind of afternoon for both clubs

For City, the defeat does not change their position at the top of the table dramatically, but it does end the sense of inevitability that had built up around Maresca’s start to life at the club. Having gone unbeaten through their first seven league games, a first defeat was always going to arrive at some point. That it came away at a Villa side who had looked, only a few weeks ago, like one of the division’s struggling teams will sting rather more than most.

For Villa, it is the clearest sign yet that their season is turning. Emery’s side have now put together back to back wins after a difficult opening block of fixtures, and doing it by beating the league leaders at home gives them a platform heading into the next run of games. Whatever doubts followed Jackson’s move from Chelsea in the summer, they feel like a distant memory after an afternoon like this.

The title race itself remains wide open at the top of the table, with City’s closest challengers all chasing points of their own elsewhere in the division this weekend. Results like this one are exactly why nobody at the top can afford to relax, and exactly why afternoons like this one at Villa Park are worth paying attention to.

If you enjoyed this, consider following It Was Always… Football for more of the stories shaping the Premier League season.

Michael Carrick walked into his media briefing at Carrington and, without being asked a single question, delivered an unprompted monologue lasting more than five minutes. It arrived after one of the worst weeks of his time in charge: a 4-1 Champions League defeat away at Como on Wednesday, in which United trailed inside two minutes and were four goals down before Joshua Zirkzee’s stoppage time consolation, and a round of comments from captain Bruno Fernandes that appeared to question the coaching staff’s approach to that game. United have now won only two of their last 11 matches in all competitions and sit 13th in the Premier League, seven points from seven games, with a squad that looked, by Carrick’s own admission, in need of a reminder of what the shirt is supposed to mean.

What followed was not a defence of a tactical plan or a breakdown of Como’s pressing triggers. It was an argument about identity, delivered by a manager whose own position has rarely looked shakier.

A speech about humility, not about football

Carrick’s central theme was earned success rather than assumed success. “We need to respect what it takes to be here,” he said, before going further: “Entitlement cannot be at this football club.” He framed the club’s history, the trophies and the famous names, as something that had to be lived up to rather than leaned on. “It comes down to humility,” he added, insisting supporters “need to feel that” from the players wearing the shirt.

It was a pointed message, delivered days after Lisandro Martinez had publicly criticised director of football Jason Wilcox’s recruitment work and barely a week after Gary Neville had warned that Carrick’s own position could come under serious scrutiny by January if results did not improve. Rather than retreat from the pressure, Carrick leaned into it. Asked directly whether he believed he could turn the situation around, he did not hesitate. “100%, yeah,” he said, adding that he had already spoken with both the club’s hierarchy and his players. “The responsibility for me to be in this position is to lead.”

Giggs, Rooney and Ferguson as a lesson in perspective

The most striking part of the press conference was Carrick’s decision to invoke some of the biggest names in the club’s history, not to borrow their authority but to make the opposite point. “It was never about Ryan Giggs, it was about Manchester United,” he said of one of the most decorated players the club has produced, adding that “Manchester United is always bigger than any individual.” He pointed to Wayne Rooney as an example of a forward who sacrificed personal glory for the team, and suggested Sir Alex Ferguson’s defining quality was that the club always came before any individual achievement. He went back further still, to Sir Matt Busby and Sir Bobby Charlton, and the resilience it took to rebuild Manchester United after the Munich air disaster.

It was a deliberate choice of reference points. By reaching for the club’s most celebrated figures and framing all of them as servants of something bigger than themselves, Carrick was drawing a direct contrast with a current squad he clearly believes has drifted from that standard. He was equally direct in rejecting suggestions of a split dressing room. “It’s not divided,” he said. “We just need to get back to doing what we do best, and we will.”

The Fernandes question he would not answer

Carrick’s toughest moment came when he was pressed on his captain. Fernandes had criticised the team’s approach to the Como game in comments to Sky Italia, and speculation has grown over whether he should keep the armband for Sunday’s match. Asked outright whether he would consider stripping Fernandes of the captaincy, Carrick refused to offer any guarantee. “I will always do what is best for the football club,” he said, declining to confirm whether he had even spoken to his captain about the comments. “I don’t think this is the time to go into too much detail.”

That answer mattered. Reports elsewhere have suggested Fernandes will keep the armband and will not be fined, but those assurances have come from club sources rather than from Carrick himself in public. Leaving the question open, rather than shutting it down, kept the story alive heading into the weekend and added an extra layer of intrigue to a team selection that already had plenty riding on it.

What is actually waiting on Sunday

For all the talk of history and humility, Carrick’s words will mean little if United do not start winning matches again, and Bournemouth at Old Trafford on Sunday is where that process needs to begin. Kick off is 2pm, with Sky Sports Main Event showing the match as the clocks change for winter.

United’s team news only adds to the sense of a squad under strain. Kobbie Mainoo and Luke Shaw remain out, along with Patrick Dorgu and Manuel Ugarte, while Benjamin Sesko is a doubt with a shin issue. There is slightly better news in the possible returns of Marcus Rashford and Lisandro Martinez, and Ayden Heaven could also be available again after illness. Bournemouth, managed by Marco Rose and still searching for consistency of their own in the bottom half of the table, will have Junior Kroupi available after a foot problem, with Alex Toth their main absentee.

None of that changes the basic equation facing Carrick. He has made his case publicly, invoking the club’s greatest names to remind his players what is expected of them, and he has made clear he sees leadership as his responsibility rather than anyone else’s. Now it has to show up in the one place that still decides a manager’s fate: the scoreline. A response on Sunday would go a long way to turning Friday’s words into something more than a well delivered speech. Another defeat would make them very hard to repeat with a straight face.

If you enjoyed this, consider following It Was Always… Football for more on the stories shaping the game, on and off the pitch.

James Maddison had not started a Premier League match in five hundred and thirty-six days. When the chance finally came, on a wet Monday night against Coventry City, he needed just fourteen minutes to remind everyone at Tottenham what they had been missing.

His opener was a first-time finish that dipped over goalkeeper Carl Rushworth from the edge of the box, the kind of goal that settles nerves rather than simply the scoreline. It helped Tottenham to a 3-1 win, their first league victory of the season, and it was the sort of moment a footballer pictures during the long, grinding months of rehabilitation. Maddison admitted as much afterwards. “They are the ones you dream of,” he told Sky Sports, describing his recovery from a serious knee ligament injury as “the light at the end of the tunnel.”

Now comes a far sterner examination of where that comeback really stands. Tottenham travel to Stamford Bridge on Saturday evening to face a Chelsea side that has won its last two matches and sits fourth in the Premier League. Roberto De Zerbi must decide exactly how much he can ask of a player who, before that Coventry appearance, had barely managed two full matches of senior football in almost a year and a half.

A comeback nobody wants to rush

Maddison’s injury story has been a cruel one. His last competitive start before Coventry came back in May 2025, under a different manager, and a serious knee ligament problem kept him out for the best part of two seasons, with setbacks along the way that delayed what should have been a straightforward return. By the time he finally got his chance from the start again, De Zerbi had already made clear he was in no rush to force the issue.

That caution has not disappeared just because the comeback produced a goal. Speaking before the Chelsea game, De Zerbi was blunt about his reluctance to throw Maddison straight back into a run of matches. “I don’t want to take risks,” he said, a reminder that one good night against Coventry does not erase eighteen months of muscle memory and match sharpness that still needs to be rebuilt carefully. Maddison himself has said the timing of his return felt right because he and his manager had spoken about it during the week, and that De Zerbi had wanted to watch him from the side rather than push him into a decision before he was ready.

Tottenham’s team news around the Chelsea match reflects that same caution across the squad. Pedro Porro has been pictured back in training and is hopeful of involvement after missing games either side of the international break. Destiny Udogie, rested against Coventry, has had a couple of weeks to recover from a knee issue and is expected to be in contention, though De Zerbi remains wary of overworking him so soon.

A reminder that he was not alone

Maddison’s comeback shared the spotlight that night with another one. Dejan Kulusevski came off the bench to a standing ovation, making his first appearance in around seventeen months after his own long battle back from injury. Maddison said he understood exactly how that felt, and that seeing his teammate get his moment back made the whole evening “worth it.”

Omar Marmoush added Tottenham’s second with a second-half finish, one small return on a vast summer outlay that has defined De Zerbi’s first months in charge. Spurs are reported to have spent in the region of £237million rebuilding the squad around him, with Marmoush joined by Sandro Tonali and Savio among the new faces brought in to transform a team that had been fighting relegation only months earlier. For long spells of this season, the results have not matched the outlay, which is exactly why a night like the Coventry win, built on two emotional returns from injury rather than a big name arrival, mattered so much.

The table still tells its own story

For all the emotion, Tottenham remain only sixteenth in the Premier League, level on six points with Coventry and separated only by goal difference. The size of the rebuild under De Zerbi makes that position hard to ignore, and a trip to an in form Chelsea side will say a great deal about how much of the Coventry performance can be built upon.

There is also a familiar absence to navigate. Rodrigo Bentancur will serve the second match of a three game suspension at Stamford Bridge, having been sent off at Old Trafford earlier this month for a headbutt on Luke Shaw after the United full back had shoved him to the ground. Tottenham chose not to appeal, wary of the ban being extended further, and Bentancur will also miss the following match against Crystal Palace. Mykhailo Mudryk, out on loan at Tottenham from Chelsea, is ineligible to face his parent club under the terms of his loan.

Chelsea, by contrast, arrive with real momentum. Xabi Alonso’s side have won their last two matches, beating Bournemouth at home before ending Everton’s seven match unbeaten run with a 2-0 win at Goodison Park. It follows an uneven opening stretch that included defeats to Arsenal and Brentford sandwiched around a draw with Hull City, but Alonso has consistently framed the project as a longer term one. “The Chelsea we are now, and the Chelsea we will be in May, will be different,” he said recently. “And I’m sure it will be better.”

What Saturday can still prove

A result at Stamford Bridge would mean more to Tottenham than three points alone. It would suggest that the emotional lift of the Coventry win, and the careful handling of a player who has fought his way back from such a long absence, can translate into something more durable against one of the division’s in form sides. For Maddison, it would be another step in a recovery that has already asked a great deal of his patience. For De Zerbi, it would be early evidence that a squad rebuilt at enormous cost is finally beginning to find its feet.

Either way, few fixtures this weekend carry quite the same mixture of relief, risk and renewed hope. It is exactly the kind of storyline worth following closely over the coming weeks.

If stories like this are the reason you follow football, subscribe to It Was Always… Football and get every piece as soon as it lands.

Arsenal go into the weekend second in the Premier League, three points behind leaders Manchester City, and in good health in almost every sense except the one that matters most right now. Mikel Arteta’s pre-match press conference this week did not bring the reassurance his club might have hoped for. Instead, it confirmed that Bukayo Saka’s quad injury is a genuine concern, added William Saliba to the list of absentees for Saturday’s visit of Everton to the Emirates, and left the manager fielding questions about an attacking line up that is suddenly a good deal thinner than it looked a fortnight ago.

Saka went down clutching his leg within the opening ten minutes of Wednesday’s 2-2 draw at Bayern Munich, immediately signalling to the bench. Eberechi Eze came on in his place and put Arsenal ahead, only for Bayern to turn the game around, before Declan Rice forced a 2-2 draw with a leveller of his own late on. It was after the match that Arteta delivered his first, blunt assessment. “It’s his quad,” he said. “They are a bit concerned. A player who has to come off with a really sharp pain is never good news, but we have to wait and see.”

That wait is still ongoing. Arsenal have not put an official timeframe on Saka’s return, and Arteta has offered no specific date publicly, only repeating that the club will not rush an assessment. Some reports in England have suggested the layoff could stretch to around a month, potentially keeping him out through the November international break, but that figure has not been confirmed by the club and should be treated as an estimate rather than fact. What is certain is that Saka will have no part in Saturday’s game, and that his absence alone would have been a significant blow even without everything else that has followed it this week.

A Longer Road Back for Saliba

The bigger surprise in Arteta’s briefing was the update on William Saliba, who has not played a single minute this season because of a back problem first picked up at the World Cup. Arsenal opted against surgery over the summer, choosing a managed rehabilitation programme instead, and the defender has progressed to individual work on the grass at the training ground. Arteta sounded genuinely encouraged by how that has gone. “Every sign so far has been very, very positive,” he said, before adding that another scan is planned this week to check on his healing. “It will be great to have him,” he said, though he stopped short of naming a return date.

That caution matters. Different outlets have floated return windows anywhere between the end of November and December, and until that next scan comes back, nobody at the club appears willing to commit to either. For a defence that has otherwise looked settled, losing a player of Saliba’s quality for this long is a significant subplot running alongside the more visible drama around Saka, even if it has drawn less attention outside north London.

A Little Relief Further Forward

It is not entirely bleak reading for Arteta. Christos Tzolis, who picked up a hamstring injury on international duty with Greece, is said to be responding well to his own rehabilitation. “Another one that, hopefully, we can have back in a few weeks,” Arteta said, which at least offers a firmer sense of when his only out and out attacking addition from the summer might be able to contribute again.

There was better news still on Piero Hincapie, who has missed Arsenal’s last three matches with an ankle problem. Arteta indicated the Ecuadorian would train over the coming days and could be available for selection against Everton, even if starting him from the off feels unlikely given how little football he will have had. For a manager short of attacking options, a fit option anywhere on the pitch is worth having.

What It Means for Saturday

In practical terms, Arteta’s selection headache is now considerable. Noni Madueke is the likeliest replacement on the right where Saka would normally operate, with Eze continuing further forward or on the opposite flank after his impact in Munich. 16 year old Max Dowman, who has already shown flashes of what he can do in the Carabao Cup, offers another option if Arteta wants to throw caution to the wind, though careful handling of a player that young will remain a priority regardless of how threadbare things look elsewhere.

None of this changes the stakes of the weekend itself. Everton arrive on the back of a seven match unbeaten run that only ended with a home defeat to Chelsea last weekend, so this is not a side to be taken lightly, and Arsenal cannot afford to let a title race that already has Manchester City setting the pace slip further away through self inflicted wobbles at home. Arteta has built a squad with genuine depth over the past two years, and this is precisely the kind of week that depth is supposed to be for. Whether it proves to be enough, with the club’s two most important players both watching from the sidelines, will say a great deal about how serious Arsenal’s challenge really is this season.

What is clear is that this will not be resolved by Saturday evening. Saliba’s situation will not be settled until his scan results are in, and Saka’s timeline is still, by Arteta’s own admission, a case of waiting and seeing. Arsenal fans have been here before with both players, and they know from recent history that patience rather than optimism is usually the wiser response to an Arteta team talk like this one.

If you enjoy getting under the skin of stories like this one, It Was Always… Football is building a home for exactly that kind of football writing. Subscribing costs nothing and takes a few seconds, and it is the best way to make sure you do not miss the next piece.

Another Friday, another edition of Gibbs’ Game, and another week in which I’ve somehow managed to spend far too much time watching sport while convincing myself I’ve been reasonably productive.

I’ve actually been making a real effort with my running lately. I managed 711 miles throughout 2025, and this year’s target is 850. I’ve stepped things up considerably over the past few weeks, and I’m feeling pretty good about it.

I’ve also been using the iFIT system on my treadmill, which has allowed me to spend some time running up Mount Kilimanjaro. Not literally, obviously. I suspect the real thing might be slightly more demanding than jogging in the comfort of my own home.

It’s been a fascinating experience, though. I love hearing the stories, learning about the history and discovering things about places I’ll probably never visit. When you spend as much time sitting at a desk as I do, there’s something quite enjoyable about escaping to the other side of the world for an hour, even if you’re technically going absolutely nowhere.

The dog hasn’t had quite such an enjoyable week.

She needed a dental procedure to remove some plaque, which set me back £300. Three hundred quid to clean a dog’s teeth! I’m starting to think she might need to get herself a part-time job. The cost of living crisis really is getting ridiculous.

On the sporting front, I managed to catch some of the European football, although the cricket provided perhaps the most extraordinary entertainment.

Harry Brook becoming the first England player to score a double century in a one-day international was quite something. I remember watching Sachin Tendulkar achieve that milestone for the first time back in 2010 and thinking we’d witnessed something almost unimaginable.

Now we’ve reached the point where a player can score 200, his team can post an enormous total, and the opposition can still chase it down. Sri Lanka winning that match was absolutely remarkable.

It shows how much cricket has evolved, although I must admit I’ve fallen out of love with the sport a little over recent years. The endless stream of T20 franchise competitions has become too much for me. There was a time when I’d watch cricket whenever I could, but these days I struggle to keep track of who’s playing for whom.

I’m sure the Ashes next year will rekindle my enthusiasm. Nothing quite beats a proper Test match for me.

Anyway, back to football.

European fixtures have a habit of complicating the Premier League weekend, particularly when teams have had difficult journeys, bruising encounters or very little time to recover. I’ve certainly taken that into account with some of this week’s predictions.

We’ve also had another spectacular week of Manchester United drama, while Trent Alexander-Arnold’s supposedly dream move to Real Madrid is beginning to look rather less dreamy.

So, plenty to get through. Let’s get into it.

Bruno Fernandes, Michael Carrick and Manchester United's Leadership Problem

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. Bruno Fernandes has never struck me as captain material.

Before Manchester United supporters start sharpening their pitchforks, let me make something absolutely clear. I think Fernandes is a brilliant footballer. In fact, I’d argue he’s almost single-handedly kept United relevant at various points over the past few years. His creativity, goals, assists and willingness to take responsibility on the ball have been invaluable to a club that has spent an extraordinary amount of money achieving remarkably little.

But being your best player doesn’t automatically make you your best captain.

Fernandes has always been a whinger. He’s constantly complaining to referees, throwing his arms around, looking towards teammates in disbelief and generally behaving as though every misplaced pass is somebody else’s fault.

His body language is absolutely abysmal at times.

I’ve watched him produce moments of genuine brilliance, only to spend the next five minutes looking like a toddler who’s been told he can’t have another biscuit.

And that’s precisely why I’ve never understood the decision to give him the armband.

A captain should set standards, encourage teammates and provide reassurance when things are going wrong. Fernandes often looks like the most frustrated man in the stadium. You can understand that frustration, particularly given what he’s had to endure at Old Trafford, but there’s a difference between demanding better and making everybody around you feel worse.

Wednesday’s 4-1 Champions League humiliation against Como has brought those leadership qualities back into focus.

Fernandes’ post-match interview has been interpreted by many as a public criticism of Michael Carrick’s tactical approach, particularly United’s decision against pressing man-to-man.

Having looked at the comments, I’m not entirely convinced he deliberately set out to undermine his manager. There’s a reasonable argument that he was simply explaining the instructions and why United struggled to execute them.

But that’s almost beside the point.

When you’re Manchester United’s captain, speaking immediately after another embarrassing defeat, you should understand how your words will be received. Especially when Lisandro Martínez has already spent the previous week publicly questioning the club’s direction.

United have enough people criticising them without their senior players adding to the noise.

And what about Carrick?

I suggested last week that I’d be surprised if he was still in charge a month later. Seven days on, I’m even less confident he’ll survive.

Two wins from eleven matches is dreadful by anybody’s standards. The defeat in Italy was humiliating, and Sunday’s home fixture against Bournemouth suddenly feels enormously significant.

United appear determined to give Carrick another opportunity, but how many more opportunities can they realistically afford?

Names such as Eddie Howe, Julian Nagelsmann and Antonio Conte are already being discussed as potential replacements. I can see the appeal of some of them, although I suspect Conte and the current United hierarchy would be an absolutely magnificent disaster waiting to happen.

Imagine Antonio Conte trying to work under Sir Jim Ratcliffe while Bruno Fernandes spends ninety minutes waving his arms at everybody. I’d pay good money to watch that documentary. Apparently Amazon are already making one!

Yet another managerial change wouldn’t solve everything.

United have been replacing managers for years, and somehow the same problems keep returning. Players lose confidence, performances deteriorate, senior figures become frustrated and the manager eventually carries the can.

Carrick may well be out of his depth. That doesn’t absolve the players of responsibility.

Fernandes deserves enormous credit for what he’s contributed to Manchester United. Without him, their decline might have been considerably uglier.

But great footballers aren’t necessarily great leaders, and I remain convinced that handing him the captaincy was a mistake.

As for Carrick, I suspect the clock is ticking rather loudly.

And knowing Manchester United, we’ll probably be having this exact conversation about somebody else before Christmas.

Trent Alexander-Arnold: Liverpool Must Move On, and So Should He

There’s been plenty of discussion this week about Trent Alexander-Arnold potentially returning to Liverpool, given how badly things appear to be going for him at Real Madrid.

My response is fairly straightforward. No thanks.

I appreciate that might sound harsh coming from somebody who watched Trent develop from a hugely talented local youngster into one of the finest attacking full-backs I’ve ever seen. He gave us some wonderful memories, played a significant role in winning the biggest trophies and produced moments of footballing brilliance that will live with Liverpool supporters forever.

But football moves on, and so must Liverpool.

Trent has slipped down the pecking order at Madrid, with Denzel Dumfries and Federico Valverde currently preferred at right-back. He’s featured just once in their last five matches, and even that appearance ended after 52 minutes.

For somebody who once talked about becoming the greatest right-back in football history, sitting on the bench while a midfielder plays in your position must be rather humbling.

I don’t particularly enjoy seeing former Liverpool players struggle, but I’m struggling to find much sympathy here.

Let’s address the elephant in the room.

Trent was perfectly entitled to leave Liverpool. I’ve never had a problem with a footballer wanting to experience another country, another culture or another challenge. Real Madrid are the biggest club in world football, and I can understand the attraction.

What I cannot accept is the manner in which he engineered his departure.

This was a local lad who understood exactly what Liverpool Football Club meant to the city and its supporters. He’d grown up with that connection, benefited enormously from it and repeatedly spoken about how special it was.

Yet he allowed his contract to run down, eventually leaving for Madrid with Liverpool receiving only a relatively modest fee to release him early for the Club World Cup.

For me, that was a betrayal of the supporters who had adored him.

And what made it worse was the apparent failure to appreciate why so many people were upset. He seemed genuinely surprised by the reaction, as though Liverpool fans were somehow unreasonable for feeling let down.

I’ve always found that arrogance difficult to understand.

Perhaps he genuinely believed the affection he’d accumulated over the years meant supporters would simply wish him well and move on. But loyalty works both ways, particularly when you’ve spent your entire career presenting yourself as one of their own.

That wound will take time to heal. I’m sure it eventually will, because football supporters have a remarkable capacity for forgiveness. Memories soften, emotions settle and the passage of time changes perspectives.

But I don’t believe the manner of his departure should ever be forgotten.

And even if you remove every emotional consideration from the argument, bringing him back makes little sense.

Trent turned 28 earlier this month. He’s suffered repeated muscular injuries since moving to Spain, and there’s a reasonable argument that his very best years are already behind him.

He would command an enormous salary, Madrid would presumably expect a substantial transfer fee, and Liverpool would be investing heavily in a player whose physical reliability has become an increasing concern.

Why?

Liverpool need to evolve. They need to build a squad capable of competing for the next five or six years, addressing the weaknesses that have become increasingly obvious, particularly in defensive transitions and the balance of the team.

Spending a fortune to bring back a former favourite would feel like looking backwards.

Yes, his passing range remains extraordinary. There are very few footballers who can deliver a ball quite like Trent Alexander-Arnold. I haven’t forgotten what he can do.

But we’ve also spent years discussing his defensive vulnerabilities, and those concerns haven’t magically disappeared in Madrid. If anything, his difficulties adapting to different tactical demands have reinforced them.

I’d much rather Liverpool identified a younger, more athletic right-back who could develop within Andoni Iraola’s system and give the team greater defensive security.

There is also something rather uncomfortable about the idea of Liverpool paying a huge fee to bring back somebody who deliberately ran down his contract to leave.

Real Madrid got the player they wanted on favourable terms. If they’re now discovering that the arrangement hasn’t worked out quite as planned, that’s their problem.

Trent made his choice, and he was entitled to make it.

I hope he eventually finds his feet in Spain. I genuinely do. He’s still a hugely gifted footballer, and I’d rather remember the wonderful things he achieved at Anfield than spend the next decade celebrating his difficulties.

But would I welcome him back into Liverpool’s squad?

Absolutely not.

Some chapters are best left closed.

Premier League Predictions: Gameweek 8

After another week of European football, it’s time to turn our attention back to the Premier League. And judging by the opening seven rounds, predicting results this season is becoming an increasingly hazardous occupation.

Manchester City are winning everything, Brighton are looking remarkably impressive, Liverpool remain frustratingly inconsistent and Manchester United are providing enough entertainment to justify their own television channel. Although, given their Champions League performance against Como, perhaps a comedy channel would be more appropriate.

Anyway, I’ve dusted off the crystal ball, ignored the temptation to predict everything based on blind optimism and come up with my ten selections for Gameweek 8.

Ipswich Town 1-2 Nottingham Forest

I quite like what Ipswich have shown since returning to the Premier League. They’re competitive, they’re organised and Portman Road can be an uncomfortable place for visiting teams. But Forest have more quality than their league position suggests, and I suspect Oliver Glasner’s side are due a positive result. It won’t be straightforward, but I’m backing Forest to edge it.

Aston Villa 1-3 Manchester City

I’d love to predict a Manchester City defeat. Believe me, nothing would make me happier than watching their winning run come crashing down at Villa Park. Unfortunately, I can’t see it happening. Unai Emery will have a plan, as he always does, and Villa are perfectly capable of causing problems. But City have started the season with seven consecutive league victories, and their ability to punish mistakes is frightening. Another three points for the cheats, I’m afraid.

Arsenal 1-0 Everton

This has all the ingredients of a thoroughly miserable afternoon for anybody hoping to see entertaining football. David Moyes will arrive with Everton organised, disciplined and determined to frustrate Arsenal. Mikel Arteta’s side are hardly strangers to that approach themselves. I can see a tight, physical encounter with very little space and perhaps even fewer chances. Arsenal’s quality should eventually make the difference, although I wouldn’t be surprised if a set-piece settles it.

Coventry City 1-1 Fulham

Coventry have shown enough to suggest they’re capable of competing at this level, particularly at home. Fulham finally recorded their first league victory last weekend, which should provide a much-needed confidence boost. Neither side looks particularly convincing defensively, but I’m expecting a fairly cautious contest. A point apiece feels about right.

Chelsea 3-1 Tottenham Hotspur

London derbies are notoriously difficult to predict, but Tottenham’s record at Stamford Bridge is dreadful. Spurs finally managed their first league victory of the season against Coventry on Monday, although I’m not convinced that suddenly transforms their prospects. Chelsea have more attacking quality, and I fancy them to expose Tottenham’s defensive weaknesses. There’ll probably be the usual controversy, a few yellow cards and plenty of complaining. Chelsea to win comfortably enough.

Crystal Palace 2-2 Newcastle United

Two teams struggling to find consistency, and two defences that don’t exactly inspire confidence at the moment. Palace will be desperate to respond after their heavy defeat against Brighton, while Newcastle have looked surprisingly vulnerable themselves. I can see this becoming a fairly open contest, with both sides enjoying periods of control and neither managing to hold onto a lead. Four goals and a share of the points.

Hull City 1-2 Brentford

Hull have made life difficult for opponents at times, but sustaining performances over ninety minutes has become a problem. Brentford demonstrated against Liverpool last weekend that they’re capable of causing problems, even if their discipline ultimately let them down. I expect Hull to make this competitive, perhaps even take the lead, but Brentford’s greater Premier League experience should tell. An away victory for me.

Liverpool 2-2 Brighton

I’d love to be predicting a comfortable Liverpool victory at Anfield, particularly after the excitement of Tuesday’s 4-3 Champions League win over Villarreal. But there’s a rather obvious problem.

Brighton are playing some outstanding football.

Four consecutive Premier League victories, fifteen goals scored and none conceded. Those are remarkable numbers, and Fabian Hürzeler deserves enormous credit for what he’s building on the south coast.

Liverpool, meanwhile, remain capable of looking brilliant going forward and alarmingly vulnerable defensively, sometimes within the same five-minute spell.

There were encouraging signs against Villarreal, particularly the character shown to recover from two goals down, but conceding three at home hardly suggests we’ve solved our problems.

I think we’ll score twice because we have the attacking talent to hurt anybody. Unfortunately, I also think Brighton will expose the spaces Liverpool continue to leave behind.

I’d happily take being proved wrong, but I’m going for an entertaining 2-2 draw.

Manchester United 1-1 Bournemouth

Given everything I’ve already said about Michael Carrick and Bruno Fernandes, you’ll hardly be surprised to discover I’m not predicting a convincing Manchester United victory.

The atmosphere around Old Trafford is becoming increasingly toxic, and Wednesday’s humiliation against Como has only intensified the pressure.

Bournemouth have proved particularly awkward opponents for United in recent seasons, and they’ll arrive believing they can get something.

I actually think United might produce a response. Playing at home, with their manager under enormous pressure, surely somebody will decide it’s worth putting in a shift.

But confidence looks fragile, the football remains unconvincing and I struggle to see them controlling this match.

A 1-1 draw, followed by another weekend of speculation about Carrick’s future.

Sunderland 1-3 Leeds United

Sunderland have endured a difficult start to the campaign, and although I don’t believe they’re quite as poor as some of their results suggest, confidence must be suffering.

Leeds, on the other hand, have shown they can compete and carry a genuine attacking threat. Their comeback against Manchester United last weekend will have done wonders for morale, particularly given the rivalry between those clubs.

I expect Sunderland to have their moments, especially with the home crowd behind them, but Leeds look the stronger side at present.

I’m backing the visitors to finish the weekend with an impressive 3-1 victory.

So there we have it. Ten predictions, including another Manchester City victory, more Manchester United frustration and an entertaining draw at Anfield.

I hope I’m wrong about at least two of those.

Ideally, Liverpool will collect three points and Manchester City will finally remember what losing a football match feels like.

But I wouldn’t recommend putting your mortgage on any of my predictions. Particularly this season.

More To Life Than Football

That’s another Friday coumn wrapped up, and I’ve got a fairly busy weekend of sporting entertainment ahead.

The European Darts Championship is on, so I’ll certainly be finding time to watch some of that. I do love the darts, particularly when the big tournaments reach the business end and the pressure starts getting to people.

I’ve also been enjoying Celebrity Traitors again. I watched it last night and I’ll be tuning in again tonight. I’m really hoping Romesh survives because he’s one of my favourites. There’s something wonderfully entertaining about watching people become increasingly suspicious of absolutely everybody around them.

Actually, thinking about it, perhaps they should introduce a version at Manchester United. Stick the players, coaching staff and executives around a table and ask them to identify who’s responsible for the latest disaster.

Although I suspect they’d need considerably more than one episode.

It’s also the end of the school holidays here in Scotland, with my son heading back next week. That should mean a little more peace and quiet during the working day and, hopefully, a noticeable improvement in my productivity. That’s the theory, anyway.

Between the football, darts, Traitors and another few miles on the treadmill, I reckon I’ll have enough to keep myself occupied.

As always, thanks for reading. If you enjoy these Friday ramblings, please consider becoming a subscriber. Your support genuinely makes a difference and allows me to keep doing what I love.

Have a brilliant weekend, enjoy the football, and let’s hope Liverpool can prove my prediction wrong.

Leave a comment

Manchester United’s trip to Italy on Wednesday night was supposed to be about steadying a shaky Champions League campaign. Instead, Michael Carrick’s side were taken apart by Como, beaten 4-1 in a result that left their manager fronting up to apologise to the travelling fans and their captain, Bruno Fernandes, publicly questioning the tactics that put United in that position in the first place.

United had conceded inside the opening two minutes at Atletico Madrid in their previous European outing. This time it took barely longer, and by the time anyone in red had settled, they were four goals down against a side playing only their third ever match in European competition. Joshua Zirkzee’s stoppage time consolation made the final score look slightly less brutal than the performance had been. Como, promoted from Italy’s lower leagues within the last decade and built around the talented young playmaker Nico Paz, kept the ball with a composure that embarrassed one of the competition’s more decorated names.

Behind Before They Had Settled

The numbers told their own story. Como had almost two thirds of first half possession and completed well over 500 passes on the night, the kind of control sides are rarely allowed against Manchester United in Europe. United were not passive in response. Fernandes himself put in more pressures than any of his teammates, chasing the game in the final third long after it had slipped away, and he was withdrawn in the 67th minute with the contest already beyond saving.

That substitution matters, because it sits at the heart of what followed.

Fernandes Points at the Dugout

Speaking to TNT Sports afterwards, Fernandes did not hide behind the usual platitudes about digesting a defeat and moving on. He said the decision not to press Como man for man had been made above his head. “It’s a decision from the staff to not press man to man, and sometimes leave space behind and try to get the ball,” he said, adding that United needed to be “more brave on the pressure.” Asked directly whether that meant Carrick had got his tactics wrong, the captain was blunt: “That’s on the manager and on the staff to see it, it’s not on me.”

He went further in a separate interview with Sky in Italy, suggesting United spend too much time looking back at what the club used to be, a comment that landed heavily given Carrick’s own status as a player from that Ferguson era success. Fernandes also described the mood that early goal created, saying conceding so quickly left the team feeling as though they were playing with “a mood of defeat” before they had even found their rhythm.

Carrick Takes It Personally

Carrick did not dodge the question when it was put back to him. “Whatever tactics you play, if you don’t run back, you ain’t going to win,” he said, pointing to effort rather than shape as the real issue. He admitted United had gone to a more man to man approach in the second half and still conceded from it, which rather undercut any suggestion that one system alone was to blame. He called himself “more than disappointed,” said the responsibility “stops with me,” and apologised to the fans who had travelled, insisting the manner of the defeat mattered more than the final score.

What Carrick did not do was throw his captain’s comments back in his face in public, at least not directly. Others were less restrained. Former Liverpool defender Jamie Carragher, working as a pundit on CBS Sports Golazo, called Fernandes’s intervention a “disgrace,” suggesting the midfielder had been stung by his own substitution and was playing to the crowd rather than supporting his manager. It is not the read a club captain wants attached to his name less than a week after his own teammate, Lisandro Martinez, had publicly questioned the club’s recruitment strategy to technical director Jason Wilcox.

A Row Landing at the Worst Possible Time

None of this is happening in isolation. United go into the weekend on a seven match winless run across all competitions, sitting in the bottom half of the Premier League table after seven games, and Gary Neville had already used his platform earlier this week to warn that Carrick would have a serious problem on his hands if that position had not improved significantly by January. The Martinez situation was smoothed over after a meeting between player, manager and Wilcox, but it showed a dressing room already feeling the strain before a ball was kicked in Como.

Carrick now has back to back matches to try to settle things down, a home Premier League game against Bournemouth on Sunday followed by Roma’s visit in the Champions League, where United still have a route back into contention on three points from three games. Whatever happens in those fixtures, the manager now has to manage a very public disagreement with his own captain on top of everything else, at a point in the season when he can least afford a dressing room that looks anything other than united.

For a club with United’s history, moments like this tend to get remembered long after the scoreline from a wet Wednesday in Italy has been forgotten. Whether this one becomes a passing storm or the beginning of something more serious will say a great deal about where Carrick’s reign goes from here.

If you enjoy honest, properly researched football writing like this, consider subscribing to It Was Always… Football so you never miss the next one.

There are nights when a late equaliser away from home is the whole story. A team goes behind, keeps pushing, and somehow finds a way back with the clock running down, and everyone connected with the club goes home happy. Arsenal’s trip to the Allianz Arena on Wednesday night had that ending. It just did not feel like the main event by the time the final whistle went.

Ten minutes in, with the game still finding its rhythm, Bukayo Saka pulled up while shaping to make a pass. Nobody had touched him. He gestured towards his left thigh, had a brief word with Mikel Arteta on the touchline, and did not make it back out for the rest of the match. Eberechi Eze came on in his place, and Arsenal had to find a way through the rest of the game, and the rest of a demanding week, without their most important attacker. Arteta’s assessment afterwards was blunt. He said the club were “a bit concerned” and admitted the injury “doesn’t look good at all.” Nobody will know the full picture until he has been scanned, but the tone of that response told its own story.

A Breathless Night in Munich

What followed was one of the more entertaining 2-2 draws Arsenal will play in this season’s Champions League, even allowing for the unease hanging over it. Eze himself had a hand in the opening goal, with Martin Odegaard picking him out for a finish that was initially flagged offside before VAR overturned the decision in the 25th minute. Bayern responded ten minutes later through Alphonso Davies, who finished off a Harry Kane through ball to level things up, and David Raya was called into action more than once either side of that goal, denying Serge Gnabry early on and clawing a Davies header off the line.

The game turned again just after the hour, when Kane’s shot struck Jurrien Timber’s arm and the referee pointed to the spot. Kane converted it himself, joked afterwards that he “always seems to get penalties against Arsenal,” and for a long stretch it looked as though that would be enough to settle it. Arsenal had not lost in 14 league phase or group stage games in this competition and were staring down the barrel of ending that run, until Noni Madueke and Viktor Gyokeres combined to send Declan Rice away down the right of the box in the 82nd minute. Rice finished from an angle that gave him very little to work with, beating Manuel Neuer, who had already denied Bruno Guimaraes with a second half save and would make a further stop from Timber before the end.

It was, by any measure, a thoroughly deserved point against a Bayern Munich side that had won their first two league phase games without conceding a goal. Arteta called the overall performance “remarkable” and “special,” and said his players “did everything to deserve the first goal.” On another evening that would be the headline, and deservedly so against a team of Bayern’s quality, away from home, missing their captain for the best part of an hour.

A Concern That Followed Them Home

Saka’s withdrawal is the kind of early blow that changes the whole complexion of a match, and not simply because of what he might have added going forward. Arsenal reorganised around Eze for the remaining eighty minutes, which worked out well enough on the night but leaves Arteta with a decision to make this week with far less certainty than he would like. Christos Tzolis is already unavailable through injury, which thins out the options further on the flanks.

The timing is unhelpful in every sense. Arsenal are at home to Everton in the Premier League on Saturday, with a trip to Anfield to face Liverpool to follow on 1 November, and five matches to get through before the November international break gives anyone a breather. Nobody connected with Arsenal was putting a number of weeks on Saka’s absence in the immediate aftermath, and reports on the night suggested the full extent of the problem would not be clear until he had undergone proper assessment. Given how central he has been to almost everything Arsenal have done well this season, any lengthy spell out would be felt immediately, whatever Eze and the rest of the forward line manage to produce in his absence.

Where This Leaves Arsenal

On paper, this was still a night of progress. The draw takes Arsenal to seven points from three games in this season’s Champions League, having won their opening two fixtures without conceding, and they remain unbeaten in the competition proper. Bayern, by contrast, have now dropped points for the first time having also won their opening two matches, and the pair will head into the business end of the league phase with Arsenal still very much in control of their own destiny.

Domestically, Arsenal go into the weekend sitting second in the Premier League on 18 points, three behind leaders Manchester City, having beaten Nottingham Forest at the City Ground last weekend. The pressure, such as it was, going into Munich was more about whether Arsenal could back up their league form in Europe against one of the continent’s genuine heavyweights. In that sense, the result answers the question asked of them. The injury to their best player is a separate, more pressing problem, and one that will not resolve itself in time for Saturday.

For a club that spent last season reaching a first Champions League final in twenty years, nights like this are a reminder that progress in this competition rarely comes without cost. Arsenal left Munich with their unbeaten run intact and their manager generally pleased with the performance. They also left with a worry that will follow them into the weekend regardless of how Saturday’s team sheet reads.

If you enjoyed this, consider following It Was Always… Football for more on the stories behind the Premier League and beyond.

Liverpool were two goals down to Villarreal inside half an hour at Anfield on Tuesday night, the kind of start that does not usually end in another Champions League win. By full time it was 4-3, Liverpool’s third victory from three league phase games this season, and the inquest afterwards kept returning to one name. Rio Ngumoha, eighteen years old, delivered two assists and a performance that had Andoni Iraola talking about him in noticeably different terms to before.

The final score barely does justice to how the night unfolded. Villarreal led through Georges Mikautadze inside four minutes and doubled their advantage through Sergi Cardona on 29. Alexis Mac Allister headed Liverpool back into it before the break, Ronald Araujo levelled in stoppage time at the end of the first half, Mac Allister struck again early in the second, and Florian Wirtz made it four shortly after coming on as a substitute. Tani Oluwaseyi’s late header for the visitors made the scoreline look closer than the game had felt for long periods, but Liverpool held on for a result that stretches their perfect start in Europe to three wins out of three.

Two Goals Down Before Half an Hour Was Up

The opening spell was as bad as anything Liverpool have produced at Anfield in a major European tie for some time. Mikautadze pounced after Virgil van Dijk misjudged a header back towards his own goalkeeper, and Villarreal’s second arrived from a swift counter attack that exposed how open Liverpool had left themselves in midfield. Iraola did not try to dress it up afterwards. He said Villarreal had been much better than his side for the first 30 to 35 minutes, right up until the second goal went in, and that his players had started the game too relaxed against a team that plays with real control of the ball.

What changed was not a tactical overhaul so much as a shift in intensity. Mac Allister’s header from a Kostas Tsimikas corner on 36 minutes gave Liverpool something to cling to, and then came the moment that turned the contest. Deep into stoppage time at the end of the half, Ngumoha won the ball on the right and delivered a cross that Araujo met unmarked at the back post. From two goals down and seemingly heading nowhere, Liverpool went in level at the break.

The Teenager Who Changed the Game

Ngumoha’s influence did not end there. Early in the second half he skipped past two challenges on the right flank and squared the ball for Mac Allister to finish from close range, putting Liverpool ahead for the first time. By the time he was substituted in the 74th minute, having played the best part of an hour on the flank against a Villarreal side built to crowd that side of the pitch, he had two assists and had completed seven successful dribbles, the kind of individual contribution that decides matches at this level rather than merely brightens them.

He described the performance afterwards as up there with one of the best he has played. Iraola’s assessment was more measured, and arguably more revealing about where Liverpool think the teenager actually is. He pointed out that Ngumoha is still only 18 and not yet the finished article defensively, adding that there remains plenty for him to add to his game, which he called fortunate for Liverpool given how much is already there. It is a verdict that captures the balancing act around a player breaking every age record going at the club, from youngest ever starter to youngest player to appear in the Champions League, while also, on this night, briefly losing his man for Villarreal’s second goal before putting things right in the most eye catching way available to him.

Why the Big Names Started on the Bench

Iraola’s team selection raised eyebrows before kick off, with six changes from the previous match and senior attacking options held back. Alexander Isak and Barcola were among those left out of the starting eleven, alongside Wirtz, who had started in each of Liverpool’s previous three matches across just ten days. Iraola explained that he did not want to risk a fourth start in that stretch for players managing fatigue, which is why Wirtz and Barcola began the night among the substitutes rather than in the side that fell behind twice.

The decision paid off when it mattered. Wirtz, introduced for Ronald Araujo at half time as Iraola reshuffled his defence and pushed Ryan Gravenberch into a right back role to deal with Villarreal’s control of midfield, scored the goal that made it 4-2 with a composed finish after collecting a pass from Cody Gakpo. There was a personal subplot running through the occasion too. Villarreal’s head coach, Inigo Perez, worked under Iraola as his assistant at Rayo Vallecano before Iraola tried to bring him to Bournemouth, and the two men know each other well enough that Iraola described facing him in a Champions League game as both strange and a privilege.

A Good Night in Europe, a Messier Picture Closer to Home

Three wins from three in the Champions League tells a story of near perfect European form, built on goals rather than defensive solidity, since Liverpool have now conceded three in each of their last two continental fixtures and won both anyway. Domestically the picture is more mixed. Liverpool sit fifth in the Premier League with 12 points from seven games, three wins, three draws and a single defeat, comfortably behind Manchester City and Arsenal at the top but not yet showing the same free scoring touch that has carried them through Europe. They return to league action at home to Brighton on 25 October, against a side sitting third and scoring goals for fun of their own this season.

For Iraola, the challenge now is squaring those two versions of his team, the one that leaks goals early and still finds a way to win in the biggest games, with one capable of being more consistent week to week in the league that ultimately matters most to the club’s season. Ngumoha, for his part, looks increasingly like a player Liverpool can turn to regardless of the occasion. He is still a teenager working things out, by his own manager’s admission, but on nights like this one that barely seemed to matter.

If this is the kind of night you want delivered straight to your inbox, subscribing to It Was Always… Football is the easiest way to make sure you never miss one.

Sunderland are bottom of the Premier League this morning, and for once nobody at the club is pretending otherwise. After a 2-0 defeat at Bournemouth on Sunday left them with one win from seven games, defender Nordi Mukiele stood in front of the Sky Sports cameras and said what so many supporters at the Stadium of Light have been quietly thinking for weeks. “We are not good enough,” he admitted. “We deserve to be where we are today, definitely. Maybe because we became arrogant, this is what I think.”

It is a remarkable thing for a player to say about his own dressing room, and it lands with particular weight given where that dressing room was standing twelve months ago. This is the same Sunderland side that finished seventh in the Premier League last season on their first attempt back in the top flight, reaching a Europa League place that had not been within reach of anyone at the club since 1973. Mukiele’s honesty, uncomfortable as it is, has become the story of the week in the North East.

A fourth straight defeat, and nowhere left to hide

Bournemouth needed six minutes to get their reward at the Vitality Stadium, Marcus Tavernier finishing smartly to put the hosts ahead. Sunderland’s afternoon got worse eleven minutes later when Kevin Danso was shown a straight red card for hauling down Evanilson as the Brazilian broke clear, a decision VAR checked and upheld without much argument. Playing with ten men for the remaining seventy minutes against a side with genuine Premier League ambitions of their own was always going to be punishing, and Evanilson duly added a second just after the break.

The numbers from the game tell their own story. Bournemouth had 65% of possession and racked up an expected goals total above four, while Sunderland barely registered a single meaningful attempt all afternoon. It was Sunderland’s fourth league defeat in a row, following losses to Brighton, Manchester City and Arsenal, three of the stronger sides in the division, but there was no disguising the manner of this one. Manager Regis Le Bris did not try to find excuses afterwards. “We were below the level,” he said. “We were not Sunderland today, and that is not acceptable. It was a bad day. We won’t look for excuses.” He called the result “really painful” and praised Bournemouth as “relentless,” while admitting his own players simply were not there on the pitch when it mattered.

A fairytale turned upside down in a matter of months

What makes Mukiele’s comments sting is quite how good last season was. Sunderland came up from the Championship and were expected by most neutral observers to be fighting relegation all the way to May. Instead, under Le Bris, they finished seventh with 54 points from 38 games, scoring 42 and conceding only 48, reached the fifth round of the FA Cup, and did it all in front of an average home crowd of nearly 47,000 at a rocking Stadium of Light. Brian Brobbey’s seven league goals led the way, and the club secured a return to European football for the first time since the Jimmy Montgomery era, more than half a century ago.

That achievement earned Sunderland a place in this season’s Europa League, and in a strange twist of form, it is the one competition where the old swagger has survived. They beat both AZ Alkmaar and Torreense in their opening league phase matches, results that sit oddly alongside a Premier League return of one win, one draw and five defeats from seven games, and a goal difference of minus eight, among the worst in the division. It is as though the team Mukiele described as having become arrogant only shows up for the games supporters least expect them to win.

The transfer window that was supposed to build on success

Sunderland did not stand still over the summer. Twelve new signings arrived at a combined cost of around £141.5 million, a huge outlay for a club that had just been promoted, built on the logic that a seventh placed finish deserved reinforcement rather than consolidation. Mukiele himself was part of that spending, arriving from Paris Saint-Germain for a reported £12 million on a four year deal. The 27 year old Frenchman had won domestic honours at PSG and spent last season on loan at Bayer Leverkusen, helping them finish as Bundesliga runners-up, and his pedigree was meant to add precisely the kind of calm know-how Sunderland would need at this level.

Instead, his most notable contribution so far has been a verdict on his new teammates that nobody at the club will enjoy hearing repeated. It is a familiar story in football: a squad reinforced after overachieving finds the step up to meeting raised expectations harder than the one that got them there in the first place. Mukiele’s willingness to call it arrogance rather than simply bad luck or bad form is what has made his words travel so far this week, and it will not have gone unnoticed in a dressing room that needs, by his own admission, to rediscover how it played twelve months ago.

What comes next

There is no time to dwell on it. Sunderland travel to Poland on Thursday to face Lech Poznan in the Europa League, a competition in which they remain unbeaten, before returning to Premier League business against Leeds United at the Stadium of Light on Sunday. Danso will serve a one match suspension for his red card, since bans picked up in domestic football do not carry over into European competition, with Luke O’Nien the likely man to replace him at the back.

Le Bris has spoken throughout the difficult run about addressing problems rather than panicking, and there is little sense yet that his position is under genuine threat, not least given the goodwill his achievements last season bought him. But a club sitting bottom of the Premier League twelve months after finishing seventh needs results quickly, and Mukiele has at least made clear that the players know it too. Admitting arrogance out loud will not win a single point against Lech Poznan or Leeds United, but it is, at the very least, an honest starting point for putting it right.

Stories like Sunderland’s are exactly why It Was Always… Football exists. Subscribe to get the next one straight to your inbox.

Two wins from two in the Champions League this season, a perfect defensive record in Europe, and a trip to Bavaria on Wednesday night that will tell us plenty about where this Arsenal side really stands. By most measures, this is a team playing itself into form at exactly the right moment of the season. Paul Merson, for one, is not convinced.

Writing in his column for Sky Sports on Monday, the former Arsenal midfielder turned pundit delivered one of the more pointed assessments of Mikel Arteta’s side so far this season, built around Sunday’s laboured 1-0 win away at Nottingham Forest. Noni Madueke’s 80th minute strike was enough to move Arsenal up to second in the Premier League, three points behind leaders Manchester City, but Merson’s reading of the performance itself was considerably less flattering than the result.

“I have never seen a team have so much of the ball and look so unlikely to score. It was as bad as it gets,” he wrote, comparing the current side unfavourably with Arsene Wenger’s great teams of years gone by, who he reckons would have managed something in the region of 30 shots from that much possession. His argument runs that opposing managers have worked out there is little cost in sitting in against Arsenal: the wingers do not beat their man often enough, nobody breaks beyond the ball, and the side has drifted from the free flowing football of last season’s title win into something closer to a results machine that wins by the odd goal and shuts up shop.

A Narrow Win That Raised More Questions Than It Answered

It is worth saying plainly that Arsenal did what they needed to do at the City Ground. They won, kept a clean sheet, and moved back above both Brighton and Chelsea in the table. Under Arteta, grinding out results when the performance is not quite there has become something close to a trademark, and it is hard to argue with a team that has lost only once in the league all season. Merson’s point is not really about the outcome. It is about whether a side with this much talent in the final third should be finding these games quite so hard.

His solution is simple: play Bruno Guimaraes in every match. The Brazilian has become Arsenal’s main source of creative passing since his move from Newcastle, and Merson believes the team is at its most dangerous when he is picking locks from midfield rather than relying on individual moments out wide. It is a fair observation, even if it understates how much the side have had to adapt, with Declan Rice, Martin Odegaard and Bukayo Saka all finding new shapes around a midfield that looks rather different to the one that won the title last May.

The counter argument is the one Arteta would surely make himself. Arsenal have conceded fewer goals than anyone else in the division this season, and a club that went five months without losing a league game is not exactly in crisis because one win came by a single goal. Grinding out a result away at a well organised Forest side sitting deep for long periods is not evidence of decline. It may simply be what winning on the road against a well drilled defence looks like in October.

A Shrinking Role in a Crowded Attack

The player Merson spent most time discussing, though, was not Guimaraes but Eberechi Eze, substituted at half time against Forest after struggling to influence a game many expected him to shape. Eze arrived at the Emirates this summer having built his reputation at Crystal Palace, where by Merson’s estimate he would see the ball something like 100 times a game as the focal point of everything Palace tried to do going forward. In Arsenal’s front line alongside Saka, Odegaard, Guimaraes and Rice, that number drops to somewhere nearer 25 or 30 touches, and Merson’s worry is that a player built to dictate games from the centre of the pitch will simply not get enough of the ball to show what he can do.

It is a concern with some history behind it. Merson also recalled a spell Eze had at Aston Villa last year, when a similar pattern played out: hooked at half time after a goal conceded, then restricted to a single league start over the following two months. Whether that repeats at a club with Arsenal’s attacking depth, where there is always another option warming up, is a genuine question. It is also, worth noting, exactly the kind of problem a squad spends money trying to create. Arteta did not sign several attacking players this summer by accident, and a degree of rotation ahead of a trip to Germany only three days later is not automatically a sign of anyone being frozen out.

Munich Awaits, With Form on Arsenal’s Side Even If Confidence Isn’t

None of this changes what happens on Wednesday, when Arsenal travel to the Allianz Arena for a matchday three fixture that will say plenty about their credentials in the competition that got away from them last season. Arteta’s side have won both Champions League games so far without conceding, a record only a handful of clubs in Europe can match, while Bayern have won one and drawn one, scoring eight and conceding three in their own opening fixtures. On paper, two in form sides meeting at a stadium where visiting teams rarely leave with anything.

Merson is in no doubt about the outcome. He does not believe Arsenal have the game breaking quality to win the Champions League this season, suggesting that if he were in the Bayern dugout he would simply open the match up and back his own side in an end to end contest. He is not convinced either Kai Havertz or Viktor Gyokeres offers the explosive, match deciding moment the biggest European nights sometimes demand, even while praising Havertz as a thoroughly good footballer in his own right.

It is a view Arsenal get the chance to argue with directly. This is a club that reached its first Champions League final in two decades last season, beating Atletico Madrid along the way before losing on penalties to Paris Saint-Germain, and Arteta has since been backed with a new contract running to 2030 on the strength of that progress. Whether this version of the side can go one better than last May may depend less on league results against teams parking the bus, and more on nights precisely like the one coming up in Bavaria. Two from two says they are building something real in Europe. One well known voice from the punditry benches says do not believe it until they do it against a side that will not simply sit back and let them pass it around. Wednesday should start to settle the argument either way.

If you have enjoyed this, consider following It Was Always… Football for more on the stories shaping English football this season.

For eighteen months, James Maddison had been reduced to a watching brief. On Monday night at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, he finally had something to watch himself do: curl a shot into the top corner and set off a celebration that had been building since the spring of last year.

Tottenham beat Coventry City 3-1, their first Premier League win of a season that had threatened to unravel completely. Maddison opened the scoring after 14 minutes on his first start in nearly 18 months. Dejan Kulusevski, absent for 526 days with his own injury nightmare, came off the bench to mark his own return. Omar Marmoush scored his first goal for the club shortly after the break, and Ben Davies settled matters deep into injury time. Roberto De Zerbi’s side had been languishing bottom of the division going into the game. By the final whistle, they were off the floor, up to 16th with six points from seven matches, with Coventry dropping below them to 17th.

A Goal Eighteen Months in the Making

Maddison’s last Premier League start before Monday came in May 2025, under Ange Postecoglou. What followed was about as grim a run of luck as a footballer can have. An anterior cruciate ligament injury suffered in pre season training wrecked his 2025-26 campaign before it had begun, and a series of setbacks on the way back kept delaying what should have been a straightforward recovery timeline.

By his own account, there were “dark days” along the way. Speaking after the win, Maddison described the feeling of finally scoring again in those terms, saying the moments and the goals that follow long recoveries are “the ones you dream of” during the rehabilitation grind, and that they represent “the light at the tunnel” for a player stuck on the sidelines. His opener against Coventry, curled from the edge of the box after Mohammed Kudus had teed him up, was exactly the sort of moment he meant. At 29, with two years left on his contract, Maddison said he still believes he has “so much more to give” to the club.

De Zerbi had turned to him after what the manager had already signalled was a stop start opening to the campaign for his more experienced players. The trust was repaid within a quarter of an hour.

Two Long Walks Back, One Night

Maddison was not the only player marking his return. Kulusevski, who had been out for 526 days with a long term issue of his own, came off the bench in the second half to make his first appearance of the season. The two Tottenham players had spent much of the past year and a half going through strikingly similar ordeals in parallel, and Maddison made a point of acknowledging it afterwards.

“I felt proud for him because I knew exactly how he felt,” he said of watching Kulusevski get his own moment on the pitch again.

De Zerbi has talked since the start of the season about the lift that his more experienced, more talented players bring to a dressing room that has needed to find its feet quickly after a summer of major upheaval. “With them in the dressing room, there is another atmosphere,” he said of players such as Maddison and Kulusevski, adding that a group containing “different players, different talent, different experience, different personality” changes the tone of a place well beyond what shows up on a team sheet.

A Difficult Start to a Season Built on Heavy Spending

Context matters here, because this was not simply a struggling team catching a break. Tottenham spent more than any other club in Europe over the summer, bringing in a squad of new faces that included Sandro Tonali, Savio and Marmoush, who arrived on a season long loan from Manchester City with an obligation to buy reported at around £60m. On paper, it was a serious statement of intent from a club that had spent the previous season fighting to stay in the division at all.

That relegation fight is the backdrop to De Zerbi’s entire time in charge. He was appointed in late March 2026 after Thomas Frank was sacked following a dismal run of results, and his first job was simply to keep Tottenham up, which he did by instilling, in his own words, the character and spirit needed to survive. This season was supposed to be about building on that foundation with a squad transformed by a huge summer outlay. Instead, Tottenham went into Monday night bottom of the table, still searching for their first league win of the campaign after six matches.

Marmoush’s goal, arriving eight minutes into the second half, was his first contribution in English football since his move from Manchester City and came with a Coventry protest for handball that referee Andy Madley and the video assistant waved away. Jack Rudoni had briefly levelled for Coventry four minutes after half time, cancelling out Maddison’s opener and threatening to extend Tottenham’s miserable run further still, before Marmoush restored the lead and Davies wrapped it up in the sixth minute of stoppage time.

What Comes Next

Coventry had arrived at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium chasing a third straight win under Frank Lampard, and leave having slipped to 17th, one place and one point behind the side they had just lost to. For Tottenham, the result is only a start. De Zerbi was careful afterwards not to overstate what one win means, and there is an obvious lesson from the past eighteen months about how quickly fortunes at this club can turn in either direction.

Still, a trip to Chelsea at the end of the month and a home game against Crystal Palace on the final weekend of October will tell us a great deal more about whether Monday night was the turning point it felt like, or simply one good evening in a season that has offered precious few of them. Keeping Maddison and Kulusevski fit and involved looks like the single biggest factor in which of those turns out to be true.

For a club that spent a fortune trying to buy its way back to the top of the table, it was two players who cost nothing new that ended up mattering most.

If you enjoyed this, consider subscribing to It Was Always… Football for more on the stories behind the Premier League’s results.

Michael Carrick will have taken some encouragement from Elland Road on Sunday. His side were better organised, harder to break down, and came away with a point after Bryan Mbeumo’s opener was cancelled out by a Dominic Calvert-Lewin header from a corner. But a draw is still a draw, and it leaves United winless in six matches across all competitions, sitting 13th in the Premier League with seven points from seven games and just a single win to their name.

Neville, never short of an opinion where his old club are concerned, gave Carrick credit for the shape of the performance. He called the result a “stepping stone” and pointed to clear signs of progress: a United side that was more compact, harder to play through, and showing the outline of a plan rather than simply hoping for the best. He even floated a possible blueprint for games like this one, with Matheus Cunha and Marcus Rashford held back to be introduced from the bench as the match opened up.

And yet the warning that followed mattered more than the compliment that preceded it. Neville was blunt about what thirteenth place means if it is still the picture in January. Carrick, he said, “has a problem” if United are still sat there when the new year arrives. It is too early for panic after seven games, Neville added, but the clock is now visibly running, and everybody at Old Trafford knows it.

Why January Is the Number That Matters

There is nothing arbitrary about the timeframe Neville has chosen. January is when a struggling Premier League season either gets fixed or gets away from a club for good. It is the point by which a false start can no longer be blamed on pre season fitness or unfamiliar systems. It is also when boardrooms start to look seriously at the table and ask whether the current project still has a route back to where it needs to be.

For United, that route is specific. Neville has made clear he regards anything outside the top five as a genuine failure this season, not because of pride or tradition, but because of money. Missing out on Champions League qualification again would mean another year in the Europa League and another year without the broadcast revenue, prize money and prestige that comes with Europe’s top competition. United currently sit five points off fifth place having played seven games, a gap that is recoverable in October but considerably harder to close by the spring if it widens further over the coming weeks.

This is the context that turns a mid table draw into a story with real stakes. Carrick was not appointed to keep United ticking over in the bottom half. He was appointed, at least in part, on the promise of exactly the kind of identity Neville saw flickers of against Leeds: organised, difficult to beat, building towards something. The problem is that flickers of promise and points on the board are two very different currencies, and only one of them keeps a manager in his job.

The Players Carrying the Weight of the Plan

Some of the detail in Neville’s analysis was more encouraging. Carlos Baleba, signed from Brighton for a reported £70 million in the summer, has shown enough already to suggest United got the profile of player right even if the results have not yet followed. Neville was keen to stress that managing Baleba’s fitness carefully matters more than chasing instant returns from him, and even suggested resting him for Wednesday’s Champions League trip to Como might be the sensible call given the weight he is already carrying in midfield.

The pairing of Baleba with Andrey Santos was another thread Neville picked up on, questioning whether keeping that partnership settled, rather than constantly shuffling the midfield, might be the quickest way to make United harder to play against. It was a pointed observation, because that has been precisely the criticism levelled at United for much of this season: a team that is too easy to find space against, too easy to play through, and too often undone by moments it should be controlling.

There were some green shoots elsewhere in the division to put United’s situation in perspective. Neville noted that Brighton, Liverpool and Aston Villa all looked to be improving sides this autumn, a reminder that the teams United are chasing are not standing still either. Fifth place is not a fixed target that will simply wait for United to arrive at it.

A Fixture List That Will Answer the Question Itself

United do not have long to find out whether Sunday’s performance was the platform Neville described or a brief upturn in a difficult season. Wednesday brings a Champions League trip to Como, followed by Bournemouth at Old Trafford on the twenty fifth of October and a trip to Chelsea six days after that. A home Champions League tie against Roma and a visit from Aston Villa follow in early November, before United travel to Liverpool in late November in what already looks like a defining fixture either way.

None of those games are must win in isolation. Taken together, though, they form exactly the stretch by which Neville’s January marker will be judged. A side showing genuine improvement should be picking up results against Bournemouth and in the Europa League style run that follows. A side still searching for answers will arrive at the turn of the year with Neville’s warning ringing true, and with considerably less patience left in the stands than there is right now.

Carrick has earned himself some credit after Elland Road. Whether that credit still exists by the time January comes around is, by his own former teammate’s estimation, entirely in his own hands.

If you enjoyed this, consider subscribing to It Was Always… Football for more on the stories shaping the season.